Conversation
Notices
-
@SuperSnekFriend @alex @idea_enjoyer Wrong. We need to drop the dog entirely, and stick to the *very clear forensic evidence that the charred baby pic is fake*.
-
where is that very clear evidence?
i'm starting to see people share it unironically
-
@jeffcliff @alex @SuperSnekFriend @idea_enjoyer First, people ran it through an online service which claimed it was AI generated. That's a strong clue (although not definitive).
Second, the noise in the charred baby is abnormal, and consistent with the noise in AI generated pictures.
Third it doesn't look anything like a baby, seriously.
Fourth, the fabric near the "head" appears to be ripped like paper - but elsewhere in the image it is clearly fabric.
canvas.png
F8PxMEKbwAAEMlO.png