Conversation

Notices

1. Hollyjollytailspike (monsterislandcolonizer@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 05:54:06 JST Hollyjollytailspike

   • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
   >Better off being a father so you sons can be the vital, youthful ones. >This ride has a few more laps in it yet
   
   When do the sons get to be "vital, youthful ones?" When they turn 50 and their kids are grown? "No son, you don't need to do x y or z you need to find a good girl and settle down." This is BS
   
   Boomerconism is real because you're advocating it IN THIS POST.
   Be a dad to 3 kids, work 9-5 and drink beer in the la-z-boy is a failure state for the rw now because its just aspiring to normiedom. Being a normie who secretly likes Hitler is outwardly indistinguishable from being a normie. For a certain subset of men this is the peak, its the best they can do. For other men, this is having the life sucked out of you. You can't complain about nagging wives on one hand and tell men they to get married and spend 100% of their energy on child-rearing like a woman on the other. I'm being harsh here but the idea that "fatherhood" is the game-changer that overthrows libtardism is just absurd.
   Youth vitality and fire are the inversion of the laconic lethargic exhaustion that leads to conflict avoidance everywhere else.
   
   in the future there will be 2 kinds of people, the ones homeschooling their kids living on their farms, and the ones raiding them and kidnapping their daughters. Its gonna be aryan invasion V2 and the "don't be wild, just settle down and have kids" crowd is gonna have their lunch eaten literally by people who believe in something greater than mere reproduction.
   
   RT: https://poa.st/objects/50f2213a-5f5f-4da3-88f3-0bfff70b1fed
   • idea_enjoyer (idea_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 05:54:05 JST idea_enjoyer

     in reply to

     • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
     Just looking for an excuse to post this because it's humorous
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.
   • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks (washedoutgundampilot@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 05:58:56 JST Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks

     in reply to

     • Weedle

     There’s a kernel there that’s sensible, but all I see IRL is coping, underemployed losers feeling better about themselves. It’s one thing to be childless when engaged in a great epochal work, but working part time in the refrigerated grocery warehouse and trying to bootstrap your streaming career doesn’t live up to that standard.

     We all fail to live up to one standard or another, but abolishing them and pretending we’re all golden men of history is just a cope. Even the author himself is on track to be yet another flash in the pan E-celeb, whose popularity will wax and wane w this generation. 50 years from now totally forgotten, aside from tards like us reminiscing.

   • Weedle (weedle@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 05:58:57 JST Weedle

     in reply to

     • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
     I dont really get the insinuation here that it cant be both. Be youthful and wild when you have that vitality to spend, but then realize when it is time to become a father who can pass on that same strength and independence to his sons.
     
     Young men with ample drive and vigor have the strength to put liberalism back into its box, but a strong chain of fathers will keep it sealed in there.
   • Hollyjollytailspike (monsterislandcolonizer@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Sep-2023 05:58:57 JST Hollyjollytailspike

     in reply to

     • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
     • Weedle
     The dispute here is because some people can't distinguish between the phrases "having a family isn't the most important thing" and "don't have a family" even though they're clearly different