Conversation
Notices
-
I offer an alternative.
The complete rejection of the Blanchardian tranny classification model (HSTS and AGP) and just calling them crossdressing faggots.
If you engage in their dialect and use their terms and lingo you are de facto acknowledging that transgenderism is an actual thing and isn't just a gay sex thing.
Cut them off at the root. They are sex pests and don't deserve any validation.
-
I have seen enough tranny discource and tranny PvP to know that this isn't entirely right as it falls under the umbrella of engaging in conversation a out their fetishes and they revel in the attention.
Practicing the taxonomy of various perverts ultimately cycles back to one general truth - they are sex pest perverts. Engaging them in endless debates and pseudo-scientific classifications does not but waste your time and validate their position in their eyes.
The true way to interact with troons is as such : "fuck off retard, go be gross somewhere else"
-
Trannies actually hate Blanchards typology, esp AGP because it (reasonably) reduces their behaviour to a fetish.
-
>they weren't sex pests until they became overt sex pests (gay)
And then suddenly, for no reason at all, the impressionable autistic children became degenerates. Impressive.
>kids being anti-sexual
A healthy child is nothing-sexual.
In that they have no strong opinions about sexuality one way or another. (Ewwwww girls are icky + cooties is not sexual)
If a child has strong opinions on sex, then you should look at the adults around them. Especially the gay/coomer ones.
If you say that children are inherently sexual I will drown you in a bog.
>unless you're prepared to just kill them
Yes, that is an effective solution
-
@Leaflord @7666 @maija @paula @bot @pinguicula @animeirl I don't agree. I think people can control their darker impulses. And the young trannies were like that before they ever had any kind of sexual attraction, they never looked at porn at all, they seemed to be actually anti-sexual until they turned out gay.
If you just want to impose minimum standards on society that people have to meet so that we can all get along, I'm on board, but you can't hammer all the messiness of human nature down into a uniform mold. Unless you're prepared to just kill them.
-
>they were all into gross shit
>they weren't sex pests
Pick one and only one.
>their motivations to dress up as little girls are innocent
Wrong. They are already sitting on the rails leading down the hypersexual spiral.
Coomers are coomers, no matter how you spin it.
-
@Leaflord @7666 @maija @paula @bot @pinguicula @animeirl I don't think this is true. When I was in college over half the people in my friend group were trannies of various types (or as I'd later find they went that way later). It was because of some of the fandoms I was in tended to attract them.
The young ones seem to have the same motivation any little girl has when they dress up in "pretty" clothes and want to wear makeup. They were confused, but I wouldn't call them fucked up.
The older ones... they were like late 20s to early 40s. And luckily they kind of kept to themselves but they'd talk amongst themselves about all this really messed up shit they were into. They were all REALLY ugly-- my theory at the time was they didn't have a real woman to keep their fantasies in check so they went off the rails on porn. They weren't bad people, they weren't sex pests, they kept the grosser stuff to themselves, but they WERE into it.
I probably would try to find a different group if I found myself in that situation now, but back then I saw myself as the modern version of one of those 60s beat poets who always seemed to know all the degenerates around town by name.
Leaf Lord
bot :kiwi_dumbbell:
JAJAX
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the