> No. It's done in a controlled manner, the dose is controlled.
Not really, vaccines are not made per individual, they're made on a mass scale, so it's impossible to control a safe level of inflammatory response for each individual, which is why adverse affects exist, and why some people literally passed out live on tv within seconds of receiving the vaccine.

> Yes I am. This isn't a controversial statement. It is *significantly* more dangerous. Covid attacks most organs in the body *and* also attacks the immune system itself. This makes it extremely dangerous, just like HIV is.
Articles and images I've posted directly contradict this.

> That wasn't the issue. The issue was whether or not cytokine storms happen with infection, which it does. As far as cytokine storms in vaxxed vs. unvaxxed that's been looked into too at length. But at first you have to at least come to terms with that cytokine storms happen with infection.
If the article doesn't mention whether those individuals had been vaccinated, then for all I know the cytokine storms are happening because of previous or ongoing vaccinations, that's why I said I need to see a comparison of vaccinated vs unvaccinated.

> That would be an assumption that would not be warranted, generally.
Regardless, that's an assumption I can make because your study doesn't account for that.

> There is no 'proving the opposite' of that covid infection causes cytokine storms. There isn't going to any legitimate paper saying that.
Well you haven't proved otherwise. Like I said, the only thing you cited does not tell me if those people were already vaccinated, which could be the cause of the cytokine storms.

> 1) Covid causes immunodeficiency.
> 2) this is a red herring anyway.
> 3) you keep citing 'the expose'. Is that grifter where you get all your info from?
You haven't proved that covid causes "Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome". This and "immunodeficiency" are very different. This article/image says that the fully vaccinated are literally developing AIDS. It's completely relevant and not a red herring at all. If the vaccine is literally giving people AIDS, then people need to stop taking it / never take it immediately. Also, I'm not sure what 'the expose' is.

> as for the rest of your replies to the images...
Again you just ignore the CDC data, which means I can ignore any data you provide.

> I link to hundreds of papers in my pinned toots. You should actually go read some of them.
I've been reading the stuff that you've been linking in this conversation, and none of it is convincing or proves what you're saying.