@Narbray@ishadowx yes, as I said, I'll be happy to reap whatever benefits the increased usage of corporate Linux desktops will bring. I just don't hold my hopes for Linux to become a powerhouse or anything of the sort.
@Narbray it's actually a very weird situation. Granted, in this case they are not accounting for Chrome desktop, but usually they are.
The "Year of the Linux desktop" kinda already arrived. Linux powers a metric shit ton of Chromebooks around, which make for a pretty big slice of the desktop market nowadays, and it's the only thing many zoomers have ever used. In the same way, SteamOS powers not only the Steam Deck, but also many dedicated gaming machines enthusiasts have set up, since they publicly release the builds.
It's like a "Year of the Corporate Linux Desktop". Most of the people having access to Linux are doing it through a corporate curated and locked down experience. Kinda in the same way boomers got access to ActivityPub through a heavily curated, moderated and isolated experience in Gab, and retards will have access to ActivityPub through the heavily curated, moderated and isolated Threads. Those are corps using the "free, community driven" shit for their own purposes.
What does it mean? I have no idea, I'm just rambling, I enjoy rambling like a schizo now and then. But I don't think it will be an "embrace, extend, extinguish" situation, with Valve and/or Chrome dominating the Linux sphere and then everything changing to cater to them. And I don't think that's it because I think they are good companies who would never do something like that, but because it's not in their interest. It's better for them that the Linux community keeps existing as it is, so people develop stuff that they can keep mooching from. On the other hand, I don't think this will convert many more users or will increase Linux marketshare too much. I think Linux (as in, the non-Valve, non-Google Linux) will still keep being a niche thing, both because of the inherent Linux idiosincracies, and also because, unfortunately, a lot of software companies still treat Linux as a second class citizen. DaVinci Resolve, for instance, updates the WIndows version more frequently than the Linux one, and has more features in the Windows version. AMD, as I found out, doesn't have some graphics cards features available in Linux, and they already said "fuck it, we're not doing it". And you can't shame them, because it's a cost/benefit analysis. There is no incentive of investing too much in development for something that can reach a potential userbase of only 3% of the total computer users.
So, it's a circular thing. There used to be a cookie brand around here that had an ad that went something like "are the cookies always fresh because they sell so fast, or do they sell so fast because they are always fresh?". People don't use Linux because the programs they want to use don't work in it, and then devs don't publish their programs for Linux because people don't use it. And I don't think this situation will improve just because of the corporate Linux desktops, mostly because they are made for a very specific kind of machine, and for a very specific kind of use, so most general use things won't change.
Sure, we see a few improvements in some areas. Gaming in Linux is way easier and way better than it ever was, and Valve has a lot to do with it. I'm happy with whatever improvement I can get in the Linux sphere, and I hope these "corporate Linux desktops" either develop stuff that can improve the lifes of the regular Linux users, or that they incentivize devs to improve the life of the regular Linux users, but I can't envision a future where (regular) Linux has a substantial market share.
@Suzu@Narbray I believe that the better the MESA drivers, the more people will move to the platform. Graphics Drivers have been the sole reason for the hesitation to give up windows for a lot of people.
@ishadowx@Suzu however, the impulse of chromeOS and steamOS could bring direct or indirect benefits to us, I think it is good that it is increasing in popularity, even if it's through steamOS or whatever.
@Kyonko802@Suzu@Narbray@ishadowx >I decide to try and get into linux >install it on the VM with the intention of using that VM as a main PC for a trial >doesnt know how to do anything and setting up anything has 3-5 more steps that go into it > "wow this is inconvenient" >deletes VM after a couple days
@Suzu@AommAomm@Kyonko802@ishadowx there are also very good and stable distributions perfect to start with like linux mint or zorinOS. I started with linux mint, I had very few problems and it didn't cost me anything to learn how to use it, it's not much different from using window. I think that it's difficult to use is a pretty silly excuse, zorinOS is absurdly easy to use.
@AommAomm@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx when I got a new computer I had to update the kernel for the new hardware. This necessitated sourcing my software instead of getting it through the mint repo. You already have to source on windows but that's the first big thing on linux that's actually made me grumble a bit
@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx i dont mean literally :akko_sus: the average person shouldnt have much issue with either aside from compatibility issues but compatibility issues make up a lot of shit :tamamo_die:
@kilostere@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx well yeah since those are managed by your bios. i can tell you from experience with multiple people who know dog shit about PC that they find installing noob distro like ubuntu easier and quicker to install than windows and that not even only because it has gotten better but windows just getting worse :shrug:
@kilostere@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx most get stuck on partitioning screen, user creation that needs MS account+internet and the 20 "do you want to send pics of your butthole and geo location to microsoft" bs. linux its mostly disable secure boot
@DarkMahesvara@kilostere@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx yeah, technically speaking, installing a "user friendly" Linux distro is way easier for a newbie user than installing Windows. But newbie users hardly install Windows. They either receive it preinstalled in their machines, or they pay a technician to install it to them (or their more tech-savvy friend/brother/cousin does it)
And weirdly enough, since most people are used to Windows, they are more used to the awkward way of installing things there (usually by going to the developers site and downloading an exe file, or by going to a shady site and failing the russian roulette of "what is the real link" and downloading whatever) instead of downloading stuff from the distro "app store". Maybe people will start getting more used to doing things this way now that Windows has an app store (and, frankly, people should already be used to it because their phones work like this since forever), so, yeah. It's mostly inertia, vast majority of people are used to do things the Windows way, and they won't learn a new way of doing things. Even if their usage is so basic that they won't find any incompatibility issues.
My sister, for instance, has a laptop that she uses only for very, very basic stuff. Literally browsing the web for Facebook and Youtube, and using the Office suite for some church stuff. Her laptop is old, and Windows is a drag on it. She would be prime candidate for using Linux. But I won't do it. I tried to show her before, and she simply can't grasp doing things a bit differently than what she's used to, and I won't "stealthily install" Linux in it because I know that as soon as she realizes that a button is out of place or in a different color, she will freak out and demand me to return to how it was.
Funnily enough, people like my sister don't seem to have any problems adapting to the changes in a new version of Windows.
@Tamamo@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx@kilostere nah, that's not a thing since 10 years ago. If you install a newbie friendly distro, for starters you have a graphical interface for doing everything, and secondly it doesn't even bother you with GRUB or shit like that, it asks if you want to keep Windows (in case you have it installed) and automatically resizes and repartitions your drive, you can just go next-next-next. On the other hand, a fresh Windows install is way more arcane for a newbie user, even if they improved the installer a lot from previous versions. And upgrading is never recomended, I think not even Microsoft recomends doing it.
@Tamamo@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx@kilostere LVM is the "logical volume management", it's like an abstraction layer that allows you to use virtual disks over your disks natively. So instead of partitioning your disk, you create logical volumes over it that act like their own disks, you can span them over multiple disks, etc.
But here's the thing, this is pretty advanced stuff that you usually have to go out of your way to configure, a newbie friendly distro installer would never throw it in your face. Heck, I think not even NixOS installation wizard asked me about LVM.
@Tamamo@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx@kilostere its a well known meme the ranking is absolutely worthless. also beginner will not even find that site because "LVM, Distro? i just install ubuntu or if somebody recommend mint and be done with it"
@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx partitioning screen? for windows? last i installed custom it was just set one partition size and done, windows automatically does the other partitions mint had do like 5 partitions manually, regardless both are just a single google search away from finding what types you need and the suitable sizes :zt_sip:
@Tamamo@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx@kilostere OK, but even then, if you are using a newbie friendly distro with a graphical installer, there are 99,99% chances that it will just tell you "OK, if you need disk encryption you'll need to turn on LVM, mark this checkbox" and then it will create everything for you in a sane default. It's like in Windows, when you need to activate something and it asks you to activate 10 other obscure things as prerequisites, but somehow NOW it's a problem.
@Tamamo@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx@kilostere thats not the partitioning screen but the "windows was already installed" :kekw: again your the one who claims he was unable to install linux because he read a acronym he didn't know in an advanced context menu :shrug:
@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@Tamamo@ishadowx i installed windows on a VM yesterday, thats the installer regardless of if you have windows installed ive never even hit that button custom is three clicks, 5 if you want a custom size :jahy_stare2:
@Tamamo@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx@kilostere Also, notice that we are kinda talking about two different things here. In one, we are installing Linux fresh in a machine that either doesn't have anything installed or has Windows intalled. It's expected that there will be some disk partitioning involved. In the other, you are upgrading an already installed version of Windows that already has all the partitioning done. It's obvious it will be "simpler". And again, upgrading is not recommended because Windows always craps it's pants with registry stuff and other weird bullshit when you upgrade from a previous version, ideally you'll always want to do a fresh intall.
And most Linux distributions don't require you to insert the disk and go to the installer to upgrade them :cirno_sip:
@Suzu@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx@kilostere It might have done in the past but a windows 10 "upgrade" will simply dump a fresh install on your disk with all your old stuff like apps and settings moved to a window.old folder. The only thing it keeps is the user and any non program files in the home folder.
@Suzu@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Narbray@Tamamo@ishadowx in windows you can just set one and itll do they others for you with minimal space dark says you can do the same so ill trust him on that for now :kanna_inspect: installing for either one is usually braindead easy :akko_tired:
@kilostere@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@Tamamo@ishadowx what do you mean "you can't set one size"? Both in Windows and in Linux, your options are either: - wipe the entire disk and we create the partitions for you automagically - manually edit your partitions
@kilostere@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Narbray@Tamamo@ishadowx yeah, you can. Linux just tends to bother you more with partitions because it's common to have the /home in a separate partition, so it might want you to decide the size of both the root partition and the home partition, while in WIndows that's usually not an issue (and actually Windows craps it's pants if you put the User folder in another partition).
I miss installers that let me choose what i want to install. MX Linux was the only distro that let me choose not waste disk space on shit like CUPS during instalation.
@kilostere@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Narbray@Suzu@ishadowx With linux i'm paranoid when i need to do something in the future they'll be like: oh you wanna do that, you'll need LVM. Oh you didn't tick that LVM box during instaltion, LOL NOOB you better reinstall your entire system and not forget LVM this time LMAO.
Seriously speaking, the reason to not recommend Ubuntu or it's derivatives anymore is because snap is a travesty.
And unfortunately it seems Red Hat turned irredeemably evil the last couple months, and even Fedora is compromised, so we are starting to have a hard time finding good "easy to use" distros.
Reminder Apple actually prevented you from installing older versions of their own goddamn OS on YOUR machine as far as 2002. Want to run Mac OS 9.2 on your G4 tower? Fuck you, you're gonna use OS X and you're gonna like it despite still having massive compatibility issues. If you wanted to run Mac OS 9.2 on those machines you had to buy a G4 tower with a special BIOS that allowed you to boot Mac OS 9.2.
@DarkMahesvara@Suzu@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Narbray@ishadowx@kilostere Classic Mac OS was incredibly flexible. If you wanted to boot an old mac all you needed to do is to create a folder called "System Folder" and drag the files 'System' and 'Finder' in it and you had a completely bare bones bootable Mac OS. It was that easy.
Come to think of it. The version locking bullshit apple did started with the iMacs. Those things were BIOS locked to boot from anything lower as Mac OS 9.0 even though they were perfectly capable of booting from older versions like 8.5 which was more stable.
So you can thank apple for the hardware OS lockout bullshit. They started it.
@kilostere@Tamamo@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Suzu@ishadowx I've used a friend's mac several times, I haven't really noticed how great a mac is.... I find it funny how many people say they don't want to switch to linux because they don't know how to use it but they accept a mac with open arms.
@Suzu@Narbray@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@ishadowx@kilostere An OS from 1998. An installer that actually lets to choose what to install so you don't have to waste time cleaning up its crap. How the fuck did we go backwards. There is no excuse for this shit.
@DarkMahesvara@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Suzu@Tamamo@ishadowx@kilostere yeah, and in linux much of the pre-installed software can be safely removed, many distributions come with firefox `but you can remove it without problems, but in window you have to swallow the fucking edge, and to top it off now are forcing some system links to be opened on edge
@Narbray@AommAomm@Kyonko802@Suzu@Tamamo@ishadowx@kilostere bloat in linux is usually a meme anyways. most of the time its a fancy feature full desktop environment that might take couple more % of CPU and RAM or just more packages that do nothing and just take up little space.
meanwhile bloat in most proprietary operating systems means meaningfully worse user experience and performance. for example news and search bar phoning home and getting inserted with ads.
@Suzu@Narbray@AommAomm@DarkMahesvara@Kyonko802@Tamamo@ishadowx you can rip a ton of things out of windows and have it work just fine, the number of things you probably want to tear out only grows though :akko_sus: ive never seen file sexplorer :file_sexplorer: ads but apparently thats a thing :senko_think: ive just left defender