Conversation

Notices

1. Steven Rosenberg (passthejoe@ruby.social)'s status on Sunday, 25-Jun-2023 05:25:36 JST Steven Rosenberg

   The key is to prevent #Meta from getting control over the #ActivityPub standard. That needs to stay independent and non-corporate.

   •  (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Sunday, 25-Jun-2023 05:25:34 JST 

     in reply to

     • Alex Gleason
     @alex @passthejoe There's also whatever the fuck LitePub/Pleroma do. I think when fetching objects, Mastodon gladly accepts whatever Content-Type there is as long as the object itself is valid while Pleroma fails to fetch it if it isn't application/activity+json. Seen it twice, with two different projects built from the ground up.
   • Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Sunday, 25-Jun-2023 05:25:35 JST Alex Gleason

     in reply to
     @passthejoe There's basically not even a standard. The standard is just Mastodon.
   • :blank: (i@declin.eu)'s status on Sunday, 25-Jun-2023 05:41:19 JST :blank:

     in reply to

     • Alex Gleason
     • 
     @mint @alex @passthejoe litepub isn't real, activitypub as she spoke would be good to write as the nostr people have, and not just the schema as alex posted last time
     
     pleroma will also take ld+json, but most people don't include the profile, as i had to find out helping one guy not break threads
     
     https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/blob/develop/lib/pleroma/object/fetcher.ex#L219
      likes this.
   • :blank: (i@declin.eu)'s status on Sunday, 25-Jun-2023 05:43:34 JST :blank:

     in reply to

     • Alex Gleason
     • 
     • :blank:
     @mint @alex @passthejoe i guess https://flak.tedunangst.com/post/ActivityPub-as-it-has-been-understood should be that already, but reading over it last time wasn't giving much confidence
      likes this.