@sjw R*dditors are already shitflinging saying it won't be waterproof anymore (hint: phones aren't already, and even phones from the early 2000's could handle a bit of moisture). And everyone already uses a case anyway and most of those are good enough to keep water out
One of the reasons we went with non-replaceable batteries is that this prevents the user from cutting power and corrupting storage, which is something users like to do the moment the phone gets a little slow.
That's a good point. There are reasons for having glued-in batteries that the EU either didn't think about or didn't care about. Which is a good argument for leaving it up to the market. It's just disappointing that there are so few smartphone manufacturers that don't do that.
I pontificate over how fucking easy it would have been for the trumbus to fucking make a copy, or scan, his 50 bankers boxes of national secrets, instead of taking the fucking originals, for the love of the game. But I really don't give a fuck about the trumbus *or* national secrets.
As for the battery thing - wasn't aware mandates were suddenly cool - I'm a big fan of making it harder for stupid people to do stupid things that I then have to support or else I'm fired - phone manufacturers aren't going to allow the phones to get thicker for this, they are simply going to make the battery smaller - if you think they won't DRM the batteries, think again
I'm all for the battery being user-replaceable. I am not at all a fan of the battery being readily pullable by a zoomer who was told "Surgeon General to iPhone Owners: Do This Every Day. (IMPORTANT)" @sjw@Hyolobrika
@r000t@Hyolobrika@sjw@r000t tbf you can observe that a certain course of action appears intelligent for people holding certain motives without holding those same motives yourself