Conversation

Notices

1. PunishedD (punishedd@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 17-Jun-2023 00:26:24 JST PunishedD

   in reply to

   • d

   @deprecated_ii Enforceable contracts are the foundation of capitalism. Make them less enforceable, you fuck up everything.

   Contracts have never been “absolutely binding”, there’s always caveats and ways out that the law has recognized for thousands of years. But since you’re talking about student loans, I have a hard time seeing the post-signing justification for making them less binding. Nothing about the terms or the signing parties has changed.

   If you want a debt jubilee for the sole purpose of screwing over the banks, that’s one thing, but I have yet to hear a reason why student loans themselves are bad other than “paying money is hard”.

   • スカイラー🎄🇷🇺 :z: (skylar@misskey.yandere.love)'s status on Saturday, 17-Jun-2023 00:26:24 JST スカイラー🎄🇷🇺 :z:

     in reply to

     • d
     @PunishedD @deprecated_ii capitalism? no thanks, i'm not jewish
     :gura_sus: 1e+6 litres :flag_china: likes this.
   • d (deprecated_ii@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 17-Jun-2023 00:26:25 JST d
     the idea that contracts should be absolutely binding is retarded nonsense and it's pretty gay seeing "far right authoritarians" take that position when it comes to student loans