Conversation

Notices

1. Sick Burn, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 06-Jun-2023 11:34:44 JST Sick Burn, Bro
   the problem the gun grabbers have is that they have exhausted, permanently, any good will on the part of gun owners.
   
   In 1990 they could have gotten this.
   • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks (washedoutgundampilot@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 06-Jun-2023 11:34:44 JST Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks

     in reply to

     @sickburnbro We’ve always assumed they’ll get ammunition storage limits instead. They’ll say ORM-D stuff is hazardous, and anything outside of ‘approved’ structures will be limited to a “reasonable” limitation of 5,000 rounds on premises. If you register and certify a structure for ammo storage (insure it, too of course) then they’ll know where to roll up when they need to.

   • Sick Burn, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 06-Jun-2023 13:49:30 JST Sick Burn, Bro

     in reply to

     • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
     @WashedOutGundamPilot yeah, the problem is that too many people have had amounts much bigger than that in storage forever so it will be hard to prove case, as they'd had to do it administratively
   • Leyonhjelm (leyonhjelm@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Tuesday, 06-Jun-2023 13:49:30 JST Leyonhjelm

     in reply to

     • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
     @sickburnbro
     
     Hell, anyone with a .22 and an eye for bargains makes bigger buys than that. A good rebate once led to a five-figure order of .22LR and it fit in like three or four ammo cans.
     
     @WashedOutGundamPilot
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.