Conversation
Notices
-
should fact checkers ever fact check domestic war effort news?
-
@Moon the current situation is such garbage that I have no idea what you're actually referring to
"""fact-checkers""" or actual fact-checkers
-
@Moon technically none of these people should be lying to us, yet, here are we
-
@coolboymew I was just thinking about fact checkers duty, is it to the war effort or to the truth no matter where it leads?
-
@coolboymew I just want someone to say it so I can bring it up later when there's not a war
-
@lebronjames75 @Moon
> only the truth that benefits or is neutral to the war effort, is the ideal answer
The thing is that it suppose that the war effort is "good" in the first place. It's really not
-
@Moon @coolboymew only the truth that benefits or is neutral to the war effort, is the ideal answer. significant falsehoods for the war effort, if found out, may become a reverse weapon of ridicule. The rest should be and stay under a (???), a big maybe. And everyone should be daily reminded: Nothing younger than 72 hours is true. Only info the lives longer than that, is to be considered. Only info that both sides confirm, can ever be known true as fact (not to forget, that the info must also stay true for 72+ hours!).
ive stated some obvious things, but the things become fuzzy the moment the question is "Whats beneficial, what's neutral, and whats negative?"
-
@lebronjames75 @Moon already lost billions of our tax money
-
@coolboymew @Moon not considering it good means you "lose"
-
fact check: every war the US has been involved in was justified and good. Verified by washington post
Moon
cool_boy_mew
l
anemone
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the