@jeffcliff@aogieglo making anything a gun free zone is a losing battle. Those wanting to commit a violent crime are probably not particularly concerned about avoiding contraband rules. You could even say that a person who wants to do a lot of damage might target a location where law abiding citizens are likely not to be armed.
@jeffcliff@aogieglo > I guess but the point is there's a very tight knit community
So it wasn't the fact that your school was designated as a gun free zone, but the tight knit community around the school that resulted in lower crime.
> I know it's hard to imagine
yeah because thinking that cultural changes are more significant than legislative/policy changes when it comes to preventing crime in a community means that my community doesn't respect guns or schools 🙄
I guess but the point is there's a very tight knit community around that particular elementary school and people leave their guns at home when going into it.
I know it's hard to imagine, but there's a culture of being very respectful about guns and schools in some places
@jeffcliff@thatguyoverthere But Jeff... you're a C*nadian. You niggers are scared of a strong breeze. Obviously a firearm would send you into hysterical shock.
> So it wasn't the fact that your school was designated as a gun free zone, but the tight knit community around the school that resulted in lower crime.
Right - we didn't *have* to designate the school as a gun free zone because the idea of bringing guns into a school would have been considered dangerously retarded
> yeah because thinking that cultural changes are more significant than legislative/policy changes when it comes to preventing crime in a community means that my community doesn't respect guns or schools 🙄
you already insinuated though. My point is not that kids should take guns to school. that's retarded. My original point was simply that banning backpacks doesn't stop people from finding ways to bring guns into school. The school is already a gun free zone, and that isn't working. There are cultural problems that aren't simply related to the ownership of guns that lead people to attack others in their community, and I suspect that in this particular case the kid had their parents firearm because the parent was not acting responsibly. They may have just thought it was cool or they might have been being bullied and felt they couldn't ask someone for help. The parent should be held responsible for allowing the child to get their hands on the firearm (especially considering it was loaded - I suspect it was being stored that way). I think that if a school district is in an area where violent crime is high, the community should have the right to request the school be hardened which might include staff being authorized to carry a firearm. I would say if staff do carry in a school it should be concealed to not cause any tension or make themselves a target.
> we didn't *have* to designate the school as a gun free zone because the idea of bringing guns into a school would have been considered dangerously retarded
we don't need more policy, we need better communities that police themselves better.
@mike805@aogieglo@jeffcliff yeah I think firearms education could help people learn some of the essentials of firearm safety. Maybe you wouldn't have parents that leave a loaded firearm where a third grader can get to it.
@thatguyoverthere@aogieglo@jeffcliff There was a time, not that long ago, when quite a few schools had rifle clubs, and people did bring long guns to school to participate in shooting sports. Nobody was worried about them shooting each other.
@thatguyoverthere@aogieglo@jeffcliff I like this picture to show what the world was once like. Two kids clowning around with a toy gun in front of a cop. The cop is making a funny face, obviously amused. Nobody is worried that the gun might be real, the kid might be crazy, and they might be about to get shot.
What changed? Seriously, WHAT CHANGED? There were gangs and criminals and crazy people then too. But something fundamentally changed.
@mike805@aogieglo@jeffcliff this really hits the main point I think is entirely missed in the gun control debate. No amount of rules and restrictions around firearms ownership can fix a broken culture. Something else has to change in homes and towns/cities.
@thatguyoverthere@aogieglo@jeffcliff And the more broken the culture becomes, the more people are going to feel like they need a gun in case crazy comes for them.
When that picture was taken, most cities did not permit concealed carry, with a few exceptions for people who could show 'good cause." Often that meant "friend of the police chief."
Most people didn't feel the need to carry, so there was no big push to legalize it.