yeah I'm aware stuff like librewolf exists but Firefox was never that good at complying with web standards anyway and Google is a billion dollar company that has time to dedicate a team of autists to that thing so may as well go for the next best thing. Before you ask no I do not use adblocking extensions.
@nyanide@nicholas I think Chromium is fully free as Qt uses it for the webview. Google then tacks on the proprietary components for login integrations, syncing, and mostly more precise tracking. Base Chromium really is a forked version of WebKit from years ago. To my understading, the ungoogled-chromium projects only removes references to Google documentation, store integration, the less precise tracking and likely some other bits.
@mitchconner@nicholas@nyanide Literally does not matter. When Firefox dies, Librewolf and all the other Firefox forks go down with it. A team of 15 people simply cannot maintain a fully featured browser these days.
@nyanide It uses the Mozilla Public License Version 2.0, so basically everything other than the company branding is FOSS, as is the case with Firefox too
@VIPPER eh well having used brave before it isn't so bad, the tor integration fucking sucks but other than that it might be worth checking out on windows machines
@nyanide@VIPPER Try out base Chromium and if you get annoyed by the lack of basic features like autoplay blocking and uBO's future being up in the air, then try Brave. Brave on the other hand has a lot of unnecessary features like crypto integration and an AI assistant "Leo", but at least most of these "features" can be disabled either in the settings or with brave://flags.
One has almost no features and the other has too much.
@phnt@VIPPER I have never cared for both of those things. I have never wanted auto play blocking and I stopped using ublock many moons ago. Base chromium and seamonkey sound good right about now.
I get it, it's a user-funded browser as in "if you don't want to be the product, then you have to pay for the software" which I appreciate. I hope they open-source soon (and spin up a windows version).
@s8n@phnt@VIPPER Apparently it has good features and is funded by a company which kind of gives a shit about its users. Like fuck dude is it so much to ask for to have a company care about user feedback entirely? Anyways, it's proprietary so not for me but I can understand your choice.
@pernia At that point I will either give up and just focus on my real life full time instead of dedicating all of my time to the internet or I will switch to surf and webkit2
@phnt@nyanide not the greatest webkit browser, will crash on certain sites. Im too normie too really be able to use it but i gave it a good try and it was somewhat ok. I honestly prefer luakit
@pernia I stopped using ublock after I became too tired to keep going through the process of verifying the sources I was getting ublock from every time I installed firefox
@pernia I check Wikipedia to see if the links I visit that contain add on store links are official sources, I even go as far as to check article revision diffs if the ublock article was edited recently. This becomes tedious after you distro hop a billion times.
@nyanide retarded paranoia. Just check their github for the link. Or be like everyone else and make sure the addon says "author: gorhill". This is nonsense kird
@pernia A lot of my paranoia is misplaced, it'd make more sense for me to run a system completely built from source than it would to audit Wikipedia articles in the dumbest way possible.