Conversation

Maybe it wasn’t clear, I’m using that phrase to show the logical problem with the trans argument of genocide. There’s isn’t a genocide. For there to be a trans-genocide, they have to claim it’s actually the fault of society somehow forcing them to suicide, which is illogical and irrational.

I think I’m fairly middle of the road here. Trans people are free to be trans people, but I also think their views are an ideological one that deal with the metaphysical self. Therefore, those views cannot and should not be applied to general society such as males entering sports as female. It’s incredibly unfair.

But the eventual culmination of transgender belief states that not only is the trans woman the same as a real woman, but that man was always a woman from the beginning. It’s directly adjacent to Orwell’s “We were always at war with Euraisa. We were never not at war with Eurasia. That’s the way it’s always been.”

And furthermore, the growth of trans people is accelerating; which is directly analogous to a religious system. Lisa Litman’s famous study on “Sudden Onset Gender Dysphoria,” a controversial paper which many discredit (I’ve read, and although I have some issues with it, overall I think it’s very good) deals with the fact that Transgenderism is spreading in high schools almost exactly like other social contagions (e.g. anorexia).

Her research and others suggest that the majority of people with gender dysphoria do eventually grow out of it. The great irony is the trans movement’s beliefs that people are causing harm to people for not affirming them. However, the chemical castration drugs (relabeled puberty blockers) given to children literally causes irreversible physical harm, as documented by Abigail Shrier’s research in her book Irreversible Damage.