@sim Shitposting aside I think there will never be any sort of solution to this while diluting the definition of rape as it is done there.

If the "rapist" can give a few $ to the "victim" and they come back for more, it's just illegal intercourse/statutory. Rape is forcefully having sex with an unwilling person. If the definitions get muddled, people will associate the word with the lowest possible denominator and promptly dismiss it.

Like when leftoids and feminists started defining "abuse" as "he called me a mean word once" as opposed to "I was beaten into compliance with a red-hot pan"