Conversation

Notices

1. VIPPER :verifiedbulgaria-web: (vipper@the.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Friday, 06-Dec-2024 02:39:44 JST VIPPER :verifiedbulgaria-web:

   in reply to

   • gatinha fofa da navi
   @lizzy
   It's funny that you tried to sneak "trans women" in there along with biological women, in order to make it so that people who consider attraction to them to be gay are just as unreasonable as the others on the list. In actuality, male attraction to "trans women" will always be gay because "trans women" are men. What they choose to call themselves is completely irrelevant when it comes to physical sexual attributes.
   • gatinha fofa da navi (lizzy@social.vlhl.dev)'s status on Friday, 06-Dec-2024 02:39:46 JST gatinha fofa da navi
     it's kinda funny to me how to some straight men, anything that doesn't precisely match their sexual preferences is "gay".
     
     liking buff women is "gay"
     liking tall women is "gay"
     liking women with small chests is "gay"
     liking trans women is "gay"
     liking women with short hair is "gay"
     liking black women is "gay"
     
     pegging is gay, femdom is gay, cunnilingus is gay, anal sex is gay
     
     having long hair or wearing the wrong clothes is "gay". painting your nails is gay. wanting to be a stay-at-home husband is gay. being polite is gay. valuing consent is gay.
     
     not wanting sex at all is "gay". being bisexual is also "gay", everything that isn't straight is "gay" in fact. there are no nuances.
     
     and they can also never agree on what is and what isn't gay.