their fuckup was lifting the limit for a few months and then telling the world they did this. If they had just learned the valuable lesson of "shutting the fuck up" then they might have been able to get away longer. Publishers were just waiting for the IA to do something fucktarded like that.
A while back on Shitter it became very common to reply to Kotaku covering fangames of Nintendo franchises with "stop snitching" or "you blew it" for this very reason. IA hasn't had their pulse on how megacorps react for years and think they can lawyer their way out of everything with goodwill, which as the Reddit founder an heroing over a 6 month sentence showed doesn't work.
@sjw@dave They can say that all they want, who exactly can prove it's the truth? And since they were giving out digital copies of physical books, some questions arise: where did those digital copies originate from? If IA digitized themselves, did they ask for permission to do so? If IA didn't do the digitization, even bigger problems arise.
And we're still dealing with the issue if it's legal for a random organization to lend these books on mass in the first place. If IA isn't legally registered as a library, and I'm not sure it is, that's a big problem. Libraries are given special protection for these things. You try lending out your legally acquired music, movies, games, etc. to millions of people, and see how well that works for you. This is why I think the issue probably stems from IA not being recognized as a library. IA's primary activity wasn't and isn't functioning as a library. This came way down the line, after they were already hosting plenty of stuff they shouldn't have (and they still do, whether knowingly or unknowingly). From the little I've observed of them, it feels like they tried to switch to a library system to cover their asses a bit. You can disagree if you want, but let's not pretend that IA doesn't have a shit ton of copyrighted and pirated material on their site.
@scarlet@dave the way it worked is you logged in and could check out books for either an hour or 14 days depending on their supply. They had a physical copy of every book they loaned out and only loaned out as many copies as they physically had at the time.
@sjw@dave The issue probably stems from IA not being recognized as a legitimate library. Never used it personally, but it seemed iffy to me. Always had a suspicion their lending system might land them in hot water.
What got them in hot water and the publishers (who were watching IA like a hawk and wanting to fuck up CDL by doing it their way (see how streaming became a joke when everyone had their own services)) on their asses wasn't just Chuck Wendig, but rather lifting the limit during COVID.
If they had not done this, they could have continued to say fair use. To some industry bought judge, they are literally no different than libgen, IA was only allowed to get away with what they could for so long from being low profile enough. A lot of people in the preservation sphere have privately said the same thing about this in Discord groups, that IA was going too high profile and picking the wrong fights.
Furthermore their actions during the KF saga and COVID scares have also burnt supporters and don't get me started on the elephant in the room known as Jason Scott (which I won't get into), as one guy I know said "meh I could care less after they catered to whining women online".
One of the big name IA guys, definitely the most vocal and biggest in the retrocomputing scene. He has a very checkered reputation for the most part, and so does IA with terms of actual preservation (notably, FTP sites were not archived). He has a very eceleb behavior pattern too.
IA is the big elephant in the room, what their goal is to do is to set an example I'm sure being that they hide behind the idea of ethics. The publishers/glowies already went after Z-Library, but since IA is in the USA they can do it lawsuit style.
Also; IA has two notorious flaws in the wayback machine: 1. They never saved FTP sites (which means many patches and files are lost forever). 2. IA would instantly and still blocks websites/excludes them with a robots.txt message, in the pre-wrongthink era it was the "Page cannot be crawled due to robots.txt" error.
@dave@scarlet How is that different from going into a library and looking at a book for a few hours?
They only did hours if they didn't have a lot of copies. E.g. I checked out a cooking book for one hour. One hour was all that was available because they only had one copy. As long as nobody else requested it, it'd continue to auto-renewal as I was looking at it.