pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 16:08:07 JST
pistoleroAndreesen Horowitz, Goldman-Sachs, Dick Cheney, Google, George Bush, Bill Clinton, Beyonce, Eminem, LeBron James, Ben and Jerry's, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Economist, Vogue, xkcd, Buzzfeed, Al Sharpton, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, the entire Bush family, David Hogg (S), Bill Gates, George Soros, John Oliver, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, John Kerry, Bill Nye, Michael Moore, Tarantino (S), James Comey, Taylor Swift, Jimmy Kimmel, both DJ Jazzy Jeff *and* the Fresh Prince, Peter Frampton, Lady Gaga and Cyndi Lauper, every goddamn labor union, all of the Kennedys except one, and they even trotted out the chick that played a hooker in Idiocracy.
:globalistlocated: Every reprehensible globalist piece of shit (hi, Bill Gates), every media puppet with a globalist hand up his ass (hi, Jimmy Kimmel), everyone that took a plane to Epstein Island, all of the venture capitalists, all of the private equity firms, all of these motherfuckers. All of the worst people and all of the people that they'd trot out when they wanted to tell people what to do, and it flopped. I mean, close race, right, but every single stop was pulled out, every dollar, every organization, they played every card they had, and it still flopped.
@SilverDeth Saw a post-mortem that said that campaign tactics and expert analysis couldn't "overcome organic enthusiasm for a candidate". I laughed out loud, like this is the premise, that people are just empty bottles with legs, bumping into shit until they are filled with "messaging" or "disinformation". It's that callous, sociopathic approach advertising took in the 60s: "everyone's fucking stupid and they'll do what you say if you find the right sequence of words and pictures". They treat the public the way an immature person treats a relationshiop, "What can I say to make her sleep with me?" or "What can I say to make him love me?", like the other person's problem is that they don't do what you want them to do.
@amerika@SilverDeth Yeah, I mean, it goes back to Huxley, then Bernays, then the "scientific" plans for organizing society from the late 19th century, the unrepentant arrogance.
@amerika@SilverDeth You have just said that it will destroy the government if I screw a bunch of dumb hoes and then you told me that this is a *bad* thing and that I'm somehow the nitwit? Dude. I think you have to reexamine this position.
> (anarchy is for nitwits).
I think the version of anarchy that you think is for nitwits is a version that no one espouses outside reddit, same as the "yelling in someone's face is a free speech issue not an assault".
We should mention Francis Galton here, the last guy to realize that eugenics is the ONLY alternative to social engineering for governments that want to remain in power.
> Aldous Huxley was not fond of social engineering.
This is a consequence of his exposure to his family's philosophy.
> We should mention Francis Galton here, the last guy to realize that eugenics is the ONLY alternative to social engineering for governments that want to remain in power.
If true, that's enough of a reason to reject eugenics.