Conversation

Notices

1. d (deprecated_ii@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 04:15:29 JST d

   • transgrammaractivist
   • Lone Starr
   @lonestarr @transgrammaractivist The fundamental problem you have in trying to "appeal to women" is what will improve their lives, is not what they want. Trying to actually help them is seen as "the patriarchy" trying to "oppress" them.
   
   What exactly are women *lacking*? They have just about every privilege they've ever asked for, and no responsibility to go with it. They receive tremendous assistance from government at all levels, and they're favored by all organizations. This has made them incredibly miserable on the whole and if you try to take any of it away, they flip the fuck out.
   
   There's no point in even talking about this, quite frankly. It's not a conversation that can even be had because just pointing out the facts gets the observer (me) labeled a woman-hater.
   • Weaf :jv::nv: likes this.
   • Magmaearth (lavaearth@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Oct-2024 11:21:50 JST Magmaearth

     in reply to

     • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks
     • transgrammaractivist
     • Lone Starr
     @deprecated_ii @lonestarr @transgrammaractivist Adding your post to what @WashedOutGundamPilot has said above, a start would be good policy for married mothers, meaning women who have accepted feminine responsibilities.
     
     Privileging single women only reinforces their vanity and entitlement making them feel like men owes them work and sacrifice and they owe nothing back.
     
     Problem is (((current culture))) gets and ruins them before they mature enough to see the benefits of a right leaning life, becoming desirable just to vapid pleasures and not a future. So they become enemy soldiers to either protect degeneracy or to get traditional benefits when they themsleves are not. A lot of red-pill anger towards women comes from this.
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.