@gsuberland@jacqueline oh also another big consideration was how many pins have to go to the mobo. i would've use an mspm0 to do all the bat management per board with some protocol over i2c or uart or whatevs then, but complexity and even more mcus aren't too great.
but yeah, running the packs in parallel or switchable was an idea so that even different chemistries could be used, technically. i only did the design for now and still haven't tested it myself
@gsuberland@jacqueline that's on the rev0 tho where i didn't find the new bms ic tho, the latest uses a balancer with integrated high-side drivers instead of low-side and discrete FETs. so it's a bit more cost-optimized/ease of assembly vs. elegant.
otoh i should also just build a board with that solution just to compare, ya never know.
also feel free to poke me with any battery pack questions or mistakes u spot :3
@jacqueline the TPS25948 chip they're using for doing the parallel battery stuff is a cool find. it's an 8A efuse with all the typical trimmings like OVLO and UVLO, but the linear FET pair they use for inrush control and active current limiting also doubles up as an ideal diode OR so you can run them in parallel.
the battery packs look super robust compared to reform classic. clearly a lot of lessons learned. they put a whole 4S charger in each of the two packs!
@jacqueline warning btw there's still little bugs everywhere, so if you find stuff and are like "this looks weird" it probably is :D there are a few bodges in the prototype. but it's going into the fixing & polishing phase now.
@jacqueline@mntmn Right now, the bottom seems to be completely flat on the inside. This means that I'd probably glue or tape things to it to keep them in place. I wonder if the Next body should come with anything that helps in attaching new mods to the bottom (like some protrusions and holes for M2 screws or the like). Or whether having the bottom anything but plain flat would mainly hinder creativity... 🤔