Conversation

Notices

1. verified neko :verified::verified::verified::makemeneko: (roboneko@bae.st)'s status on Friday, 10-Mar-2023 08:31:13 JST verified neko :verified::verified::verified::makemeneko:
   @hikari @hikari png or lossless jxl :chad: webp is google :fluoride:
   • mental meltdown likes this.
   • Arcana (arcana@pengi-san.moe)'s status on Friday, 10-Mar-2023 08:48:42 JST Arcana

     in reply to

     @roboneko @hikari yeah i was referring to the lossless compression ratio of WebP. and as much as I despise Google, I don’t mind using any corporation’s open source projects. At the end of the day, WebP is useful for several other reasons relating to some of the full stack tech I use. but i was deffo just referring to the file format itself.

     mental meltdown likes this.
   • verified neko :verified::verified::verified::makemeneko: (roboneko@bae.st)'s status on Friday, 10-Mar-2023 08:48:43 JST verified neko :verified::verified::verified::makemeneko:

     in reply to

     • Arcana
     @hikari @arcana @hikari oh huh nvm TIL that webp can do lossless as well. fair enough I guess. still not a huge fan because google tho
   • Arcana (arcana@pengi-san.moe)'s status on Friday, 10-Mar-2023 08:48:44 JST Arcana

     in reply to

     @roboneko @hikari we use WebP for many reasons, including the fact that an animated WebP of higher resolution than an animated GIF or APNG often takes up fewer bytes on disk than either of the other formats. it’s just more efficient.

   • verified neko :verified::verified::verified::makemeneko: (roboneko@bae.st)'s status on Friday, 10-Mar-2023 08:48:44 JST verified neko :verified::verified::verified::makemeneko:

     in reply to

     • Arcana
     @hikari @arcana @hikari gif and apng are lossless tho so that is apples to oranges
     
     but yeah, if you want lossy animations and want to avoid mp4 with h.264 or h.265 for whatever reason then webp makes sense. why not just use mp4 tho?