Conversation

Notices

1. frogzone@wizard.casa's status on Tuesday, 27-Aug-2024 00:42:18 JST frogzone

   • NonPlayableClown
   • mischievoustomato
   • frogzone
   • Hyperhidrosis
   • pistolero
   • broken god

   @NonPlayableClown @mischievoustomato @Hyperhidrosis @p @cvnt
   btw from what i understand, java is REALLY not that much more consumptive than C. what is ur reason for not liking java for an i2prouter. its been around for AGES, many issues have been patched, its foss, etc.

   • pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Aug-2024 00:42:16 JST pistolero

     in reply to

     • NonPlayableClown
     • mischievoustomato
     • Hyperhidrosis
     • broken god
     @NonPlayableClown @frogzone @cvnt @mischievoustomato @Hyperhidrosis
     
     > Wait what?
     
     C++ has terrible performance anyway.
     
     > What libraries are you running to have bad performance?
     
     Your point of reference must be JavaScript; my point of reference is C.
   • pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Aug-2024 00:42:17 JST pistolero

     in reply to

     • NonPlayableClown
     • mischievoustomato
     • Hyperhidrosis
     • broken god
     @frogzone @NonPlayableClown @mischievoustomato @Hyperhidrosis @cvnt
     
     > btw from what i understand, java is REALLY not that much more consumptive than C.
     
     I am a programmer and I have deployed Java and I have even written some Java and I hate Java and I hate the JVM and it's not due to its performance. C++ has terrible performance anyway.
     
     Also if you confuse C with C++ again, I would like to remind you that my left fist is called Justice and my right fist is also called Justice.
     
     > what is ur reason for not liking java for an i2prouter.
     
     Because I don't like it for anything, especially for something I don't use.
     
     > its been around for AGES, many issues have been patched, its foss, etc.
     
     I don't know if you mean Java or i2p but I hate the former and have, as mentioned, no real reason to care about the latter.
   • NonPlayableClown (nonplayableclown@postnstuffds.lol)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Aug-2024 00:42:17 JST NonPlayableClown

     in reply to

     • mischievoustomato
     • Hyperhidrosis
     • pistolero
     • broken god
     > C++ has terrible performance anyway.
     Wait what?
     What libraries are you running to have bad performance?
   • NonPlayableClown (nonplayableclown@postnstuffds.lol)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Aug-2024 00:42:57 JST NonPlayableClown

     in reply to

     • mischievoustomato
     • Hyperhidrosis
     • pistolero
     • broken god
     >C++ has terrible performance anyway.
     
     In terms of what?
     It's built out of C, in fact you can if you want to just strip it down just to use C functions.
     
     So I'm not really understanding this statement. Give me example where performance is lacking.
     
     Now comparing to assembly, I can understand but native C++ shouldn't be that different.
     
     >Your point of reference must be JavaScript
     
     Nope, mine is C, C++, C#, and Java in that order.