Conversation
Notices
-
Jeff Cliff (jeffcliff@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 03:34:04 JST Jeff Cliff No it doesn't. Copyright makes everything worse. -
:spinnenrad: Festivegoat :spinnenrad: (eiregoat@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 03:34:02 JST :spinnenrad: Festivegoat :spinnenrad: Let's take two scenarios...
Copyright exists:
- Disney makes a star wars sequel
- It's woke and meaningless
- Everyone hates it and complains about it
- Blackpills all around
No copyright:
- Disney makes a star wars sequel
- So do a bunch of small studios and fan groups
- Everyone hates the disney version, but some of the underground studios are pretty good
- People give them their money instead
- They just ignore the crappy "official" version and the indie movies get built on instead
It's kinda like a blockchain come to think of it. The more popular narratives get build on more and gradually become fleshed out, naturally becoming canon.cool_boy_mew likes this. -
william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 03:34:04 JST william.maggos @jeffcliff @caekislove @Eiregoat @adam @amerika @moshguy
my only disagreement might be that mega corps would then just rework and expand on every artistic idea anybody ever has from now on. we'd never know the name of another independent creator. maybe.
-
cool_boy_mew (coolboymew@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 03:35:20 JST cool_boy_mew @Eiregoat @caekislove @wjmaggos @adam @amerika @moshguy @jeffcliff We should have like 20 years copyright max -
≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:35:46 JST ≠ @Eiregoat @caekislove @wjmaggos @adam @moshguy @jeffcliff
No copyright:
Disney does not bother making the Star Wars sequel since it will immediately be pirated and also turned into competing alternate versions.
mental meltdown repeated this. -
Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️ (caekislove@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:35:46 JST Caek Islove 🍰 ❤️ @amerika @Eiregoat @wjmaggos @adam @moshguy @jeffcliff >If we abolish copyright, Disney will stop making Star Wars sequels
Don't threaten me with a good time.mental meltdown likes this. -
Jeff Cliff (jeffcliff@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:47:02 JST Jeff Cliff > No copyright = Marvel makes a version of every good movie ever made, and sues anyone who makes a competing version for interference with business.
that's not no copyright
no copyright is marvel makes a version of every good movie ever...and then has to compete with the other competing versions and suck it up. -
≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:47:02 JST ≠ @jeffcliff @caekislove @wjmaggos @Eiregoat @adam @moshguy
Same difference. They can still sue for interference.
-
Jeff Cliff (jeffcliff@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:47:03 JST Jeff Cliff which they are giong to do anyway...and then copyright all of it. Don't forget that part. -
≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:47:03 JST ≠ @jeffcliff @caekislove @wjmaggos @Eiregoat @adam @moshguy
Mr Maggos has a good point. Consider legal marijuana: the ideal is that your dealer now has a legit job. The reality is that large companies take over and streamline the process.
No copyright = Marvel makes a version of every good movie ever made, and sues anyone who makes a competing version for interference with business. The costs of defending those suits bankrupt them.
-
Jeff Cliff (jeffcliff@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Mar-2023 04:47:39 JST Jeff Cliff then that's a de facto copyright, or at least a copyright-like monopoly right
-