Conversation
Notices
-
Vindicated 1000% youtu.be/HNVmYuPDl4A
-
@Riamu @apropos oh, I think he's largely right about that in principle. I think he's overstating how much advancement we would have in weaponry (serious railguns, no) but I've felt for a long time that the government essentially outlawing many avenues of individual innovation -- touching far more than just the sphere of firearms -- has been extremely detrimental to technological progress and refinement, as well as to the maintenance of a skilled engineering workforce
between gun laws, drug laws, anti-terror laws, and so on there's hardly anything interesting an individual can do anymore without running afoul of dozens of laws
wired.com/2006/06/chemistry/
-
@apropos @deprecated_ii It was quite the stretch there. I was hoping nobody would watch the video and instead just read the title, instead of subjecting yourself to that retardation.
-
@Riamu not so much at the end but the technical stuff
-
@deprecated_ii @Riamu
>The NFA means that military research can no longer rely on civilian $$$
>If the NFA didn't exist we'd have massive leaps forward in automatic technology, ...
>The NFA is basically going to lose us WWIII
I'm always a fan of "evil government act subtly undermines long-term government aims" story time.
-
@Riamu bizarre experience, I agree with him on most stuff