Conversation
Notices
-
A career defining statement.
A "nightmare", some may say.
-
@crunklord420 All this transphobia is starting to piss me off
-
As per Jimmy's own statements. His corporate sponsors are going to be getting an executive summary where the private investigators describe how Jimmy knew for many years that Chris displayed pedophilic tendencies. That he was in chat rooms where Chris was engaging in sexual conversations with minors. They can dress it up like Jimmy is just aloof and naive, but that's really it.
-
@crunklord420 I watched some youtube guy that does videos about youtuber controversies and he had a picture of that person with mrbeast together in an apartment and mrbeast is staring directly at a shadman poster pinned on the wall.
-
@sun "aww schucks sorry guys I'm just actually retarded and don't understand anything about anything. I was just really confused why this sexualized drawing a 12 year old was sucking off a pistol. Shadman? Who's that?"
I've been thinking about the incompetence excuse a lot lately, for obvious societal reasons. In order to have actual accountability, there should be no distinguishing between incompetence and malice. It should all be universally treated as malice. There is no "waste", only "corruption".
-
@crunklord420 I am pretty retarded sometimes so I'm slightly sympathetic but there's a lot of evidence piling up for this guy like they are best friends right? you don't see your best friend and business associate's twitter where he says he loves loli?
-
@sun in my opinion he knew what you could reasonably know. How do I know all this shit about Chris despite never watching Mr. Beast or actually caring that much at all? Pretty much all this shit that's happening right now has been known information for over a year. The journos and Mr. Beast crew successfully ran defense on it. Muh heckin transphobia they said. Some still say it right now. They know, they don't care.
Jimmy has probably known Chris has been into loli since forever. How could he not? Now add on top of all of Chris bizarre sexual behavior. He knew it was problematic, but did nothing for legacy reasons (in the technical sense).
Reasonably he should have just parted ways during the troon-out. His not-even-really-private fetishes were now becoming a core pillar of his identity. You can't have a fetish-freak on a children's show. But he kept him on, knowing this.
But muh heckin transphobia is more important, in the end.
-
@crunklord420 @sun hanlon's razor is the most malicious heuristic i've ever seen
-
@crunklord420 @sun Searched for an older post about that, didn't find it but instead I'm now pondering how a ban-evading pedophile tried to downplay it as "he was just friends and made a bunch of silly haha jokes", also conveniently ignoring other parts of the story like how Chris was proudly grooming his own son. This sentiment seems to be awfully common among troons, even more so than generic crying victim. Sickening.
Husky_1722188098093_QA8AQ5OVSN.…
-
@mint @crunklord420 okay but to be fair the context of the reply is talking about how youtube weirdos thought there was something pedophilic about Back To The Future because why would a teenager be hanging around Doc Brown, which is an objectively brain damaged take
-
@sun @crunklord420 Yeah, but that part is less relevant to this thread's topic. Was talking about refusal to do some basic research before uttering his diarrhea bucket of an opinion, combined with ironyshielding against anyone capable of pattern recognition.
-
@sun @crunklord420 Bajax was right again.
-
@crunklord420 @sun I would say the burden of proof for incompetence should lie on the defender. Malice should be assumed per default and treated as such.
-
@Saxophone3784 @sun
>your honor I'm going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I am in fact, retarded.
Okay, so he proves he's retarded. Now you need to investigate the institution who gave authority to someone who has been proven himself to be retarded beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
@Saxophone3784 @sun the point is, it's basically impossible to be incompetent without someone in the chain being malicious.