Conversation

Notices

1. Ardainian Hebrew Israelite (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 04:29:31 JST Ardainian Hebrew Israelite
   How the fuck do you try to assassinate a president without even having a fucking alibi ready to go? A good chunk of the American public will buy the official story for anything, no matter how flimsy, but you can't even come up with that. Glowniggers nowadays are actual absolute niggers who think a slightly slanted roof 150 yards away, well within the range of an AR-15, just not falling within their perimeter is enough of a "dindu nuffin" excuse for the general public. Back in their glory days the glowies could conjure up yellow cake uranium out of thin air, now they can't even just lie and claim Crooks acted alone, they are too retarded to even do that, and have to resort to the most half-assed bureaucratic buck passing I've ever seen.
   • luithe likes this.
   • Ardainian Hebrew Israelite (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 04:59:47 JST Ardainian Hebrew Israelite

     in reply to

     • of nothing
     @apropos The security there wanted Trump dead. In a society with any shred of accountability left they'd all be seeing a firing squad. They're not at all trying to hide the gist of what happened, they're just trying to say as little as possible so they personally aren't implicated.
   • of nothing (apropos@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jul-2024 04:59:48 JST of nothing

     in reply to
     @ArdainianRight easy.
     1. aim for high disclaimability. You don't notice stuff. You have accidental gaps. You're naturally slow to respond. The assassination happens and it's not your fault - actually, you are one of the victims here!
     obvious downside: this makes you look incompetent
     subtle downside: everything you do to increase disclaimability, also decreases your ability to credibly tell truths that actually exonerate you.
     
     2. aim for Chomsky's coordination without conspiracy. You don't have "Trump Assassination Workgroup" weekly plans. You don't have plans at all. You make sure everyone thinks the same way and has the same biases and then occasionally you run simulations or counter-planning for what you'd actually like to happen, trusting that people will make the correct inferences and, on the day of, independently decide to do things to benefit the goal.
     obvious downside: all of these individual decisions make you look incompetent. Without a plan that everyone's on, people will sabotage the plan unintentionally.
     subtle downside: this coordination works for something like the media where continuous acts of conspiracy can be demonstrated, and your group policed over time, but for something like a one-shot assassination the group is ripe for betrayal - members can invisibly decide not to go along with it, and then after the fact members can blow the whole thing up and describe the not-coordination *as* coordination, and that's also very difficult to argue against.
     
     3. use stochastic terrorism to have your assassin volunteer himself. You just say that Trump is Hitler, over and over again, until someone independently decides to kill Hitler.
     obvious downside: you don't get to pick the assassin except through stopping him - contrary to your goal. If you get a really dumb who does obviously threatening stuff and wastes a lot of time, your 'disclaimable' incompetence becomes harder and harder to explain.
     
     Glowies have modern problems of everyone having a phone, every corner having a camera, and too much ability for observers to connect dots together. When they have an official pass for official duties they can go with an old-fashioned plan and then brag about it, but when they have to do completely black stuff they have these modern solutions.
     
     But also, you don't have to be a glowie to just hate Trump and realize that a little intentional unintentional incompetence might hurt him.