Hey @p I have a question. Why are microservices still pushed so hard?
I know that g*ogle is pushing microservices hard internally, trains their own employees and when they leave that's all they know how to do. Add to that those aspiring to work at g*ogle and those aping g*ogle. Still, github is filled with new projects about terraform, k8s, and many stand alone microservices (most of them close copies of one another) even after all these years that this trend has been going on.
1. As more people use the internet, the number of large websites increases, making certain niches that were deployed as part of a bigger system viable on their own. This is not true however for websites that will remain small-medium in size where microservices are too big of a hustle. 2. I've noticed the same people pushing for microservices, push for "immutable" OS type standarization. 3. Pretty sure gRPC is also a component of whatever is their end game.
I'm trying to figure out what's their end goal here, because all this seems planned and I don't think it's for the good of the open internet however much they say it is. I thought you might know more since you've been observing the trend far longer than I have.
@threat So what would you consider to be an ideal pipeline for breaking away from windows/apple? Assuming the person in question is a nontard autist. @laurel@p
>Nginx I don't think nginx is a typical micro service. It has a shitload of features, a ton of plugins and can be stretched to support a multitude of use cases. It even comes with a scripting language
>Microservices as unix philosophy I get that. The the problem is that the web is not an OS and there is a difference between an online service and a utility application. I also get that the plan is to make it turn it into WebOS that has g*ogle at the center with OSS programmers being abstracted away along with the hardware.
>Nix and Talos My problem with these is the same problem I have with gentoo, and I'm gonna paraphrase @p here, when you learn gentoo, nix, Talos you don't learn unix, building programs or running in Ram, you learn gentoo, nix, Talos. Whereas with CRUX and Slack you do learn unix. And if you need to, you can minimize disk writes without having to go through next-best-thing and all the baggage it carries with it.
> I don't think nginx is a typical micro service. It has a shitload of features, a ton of plugins and can be stretched to support a multitude of use cases. It even comes with a scripting language
yeah i wouldn't consider it a microservice, it could be by size of binary/container deployment, but that's a measurement in density not in functionality.
> I get that. The the problem is that the web is not an OS and there is a difference between an online service and a utility application. I also get that the plan is to make it turn it into WebOS that has g*ogle at the center with OSS programmers being abstracted away along with the hardware.
materially little difference if we're speaking tcp/udp/etc but i get what you're saying. a utility application i guess could be considered a microservice if it's serving i/o or sockets of some sort 🧐
> My problem with these is the same problem I have with gentoo, and I'm gonna paraphrase @p here,
i've known p a long time, i've likely heard this before. but let's find out.
> when you learn gentoo, nix, Talos you don't learn unix, building programs or running in Ram, you learn gentoo, nix,
i was right. and i agree.
> Talos. Whereas with CRUX and Slack you do learn unix. And if you need to, you can minimize disk writes without having to go through next-best-thing and all the baggage it carries with it.
i started with unix in the late 80s/early 90s, moved to bsd, then linux, etc. i'm a bit past the learning linux/unix pattern and more about tooling that makes my life simpler. crux is okay, i just chose to build my own. slackware is fine, but it's just not a very interesting system to me.
most would be surprised to know that my systems are boostrapped and maintained with a single script/service called servo. it builds out a complete stripped down linux distribution and keeps me in a simple space.
all the baggage is stuff i typically get paid for fucking with. although it makes me stressed out, i have to eat.
It appeals to engineers because they can, in theory, make small tools that do one thing (although too few of them think about fitting it together and they end up with a rats' nest). It appeals to managers because of provisioning: GCE, AWS Lambda, etc., fine-grained access control of repositories, the promise of automatic compliance with various absurd regulatory boundaries (the same ones that made everyone start requiring 2FA for everything).
> 2. I've noticed the same people pushing for microservices, push for "immutable" OS type standarization.
Yeah, you know, all of the commercially available bananas are clones, they're all genetically identical. We get an aggressive enough fungus, that's it for bananas for a few decades.
And, you know, ASLR and stack canaries and whatnot, but I think it's better to locally source your binaries rather than having purely identical ones. It is way easier to write an exploit for a process that is executing a binary that you have, you know where everything's gonna be, you know how paranoid the compiler settings were.
similar to what p mentioned, there is a because they can mindset, but it does come down to having small, constrained areas of responsibility in system. while many write microservices similar to unix philosophy, there's a lot of "pack monolith into a microservice and wear blinders" happening in the industry(s).
system decoupling works well when the goal is immutable infrastructure/architecture and having agnostic interfaces (i.e. you have a microservice written in python and it's slow, so you write it in go, kill the old service and hot-swap it to the go one live). having this sort of segmentation in. your system is nice and makes things pluggable or like legos for big boys and girls.
And, you know, ASLR and stack canaries and whatnot, but I think it's better to locally source your binaries rather than having purely identical ones. It is way easier to write an exploit for a process that is executing a binary that you have, you know where everything's gonna be, you know how paranoid the compiler settings were.
whenever possible i like to compile my own software/build packages from source. something like nix makes this a bit easier with build instructions for packages and helpers to make packaging new things easier. although i won't recommend nix to anyone. it's painful and really not something i'd use in production.
as for immutable operating system approaches, there's quite a few besides nix, guix, etc. in the microservice area talos is king of the hill. whole thing runs in ram and relies on overlay configuration and boot/init time to do it's thing. pretty slick, but limited use-case for kubernetes which i'm not willing to run anymore on my personal system(s)
these days i think less about immutability standards (i can do this myself and do), and more about being able to bootstrap an entire system on command, from anywhere, and have it be reproducible. this usually involves some base/steady-state os iso, and some config that's pulled into the system after we're at rl-3.
think of how tails works (usb in the computer, boot, operate, has persistence volume).
i do this but not with tails. any computer i can boot into and have what i need provided there's some form of internet(s) connection. even if it's heavily dpi'd/firewalled i have multiple demons looking for ways to reach out to the control server (aka the hidden janitor closet) to pull what is needed including things that should persist. this is all experimental right now, but as of this typing if i were to power the machine down, 5 min later or less i would be fully back up minus what's in this buffer that i'm typing
grpc is actually pretty amazing. but like anything, there's a sharp edge that will circumcise you twice if you're not careful. the sharp-edge being it really only makes sense in a hyperscalar system with heavy service density. you need something way more efficient than standard tcp/http calls for service:ricky_bobby to talk to service:spider_monkey. but i would argue that anyone on fediverse is not running that sort of system even though they may or may not be working for the goog.
it's like a lot of stuff i play with. interesting af until i find out it's a sledgehammer to lick a stamp and/or i'm the only dumphuk using it.
@BiggusDiccus@threat@laurel The most important thing you can do is completely ignore everyone that says anything about a distribution of Linux on the internet. I will now say things about distributions of Linux.
> So what would you consider to be an ideal pipeline for breaking away from windows/apple? Assuming the person in question is a nontard autist.
I'd suggest Slackware as it's easier for a beginner to get running than CRUX (but I think CRUX is easier if you know Linux pretty well). Some people do not like this sentence. Some people do not like Slackware or CRUX; there's a lot less hand-holding and bloat than in typical distributions and they tend to be a lot more Unix-y. It will involve more reading and while you are new, a lot of not knowing what to do, and this is frustrating to people and that is understandable.
I do not like Arch, but the reason I do not like Arch is a lack of stability: pacman has hosed itself on me a few times and I had to fix the machine to get it working again. But if you're trying out a new OS, you are going to hose it a few times anyway and a problem that crops up after a year or two isn't going to be a concern. Arch does maintain a reasonable balance of keeping things convenient without hiding things from you, and there is a very large Arch wiki (and it is general enough that I refer to it sometimes for things I'm trying to do with CRUX or Slackware), it's easy to get help.
I would rather run Devuan than Debian because I think systemd is :glowinthedark::cia::plasticbottle::indiancallcenter::fluoride::happynegro:, but a person that is new to Linux will generally not notice or care about systemd, and Devuan breaks a little more often and is somewhat less popular than Debian. Debian generally just works as long as you don't mind a little bloat and you don't start yelling "Goddammit, *you're* the computer, I know what I'm doing, fuck yourself" if you see "NO USER SERVICEABLE PARTS INSIDE" in some places that you will usually not see during your first few months using Linux. They have put some effort into making sure that the desktop works.
Ubuntu is roughly Debian-based and more popular than Debian, especially among people that are new, but it is maintained by a corporation with a history of questionable maneuvers (e.g., at one point they integrated "Amazon" into the search box on their desktop, so you try to find some file you saved last week and you get the file maybe but you also get some suggested Amazon product listings) and they cram shady analytics into every corner that they can. Games produced for Linux (I almost made a joke here out of habit but then remembered Steam) tend to work more reliably if you are using Ubuntu than if you are using anything else, but that may have changed if they are pushing Wayland.
Gentoo has a slightly higher learning curve than Debuntu but people that use it report that it is fun. It is another distribution that I do not use for reasons that probably do not matter unless you are a programmer or a sysadmin, but as mentioned above, Gentoo (along with Debian, Ubuntu, etc.) has a lot of Gentoo in it.
Depending on how serious you were about the autist remark, I think this is worth doing at least once: https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ . It is probably not suitable as your first foray, in much the same way as a dude that turns 18 and moves out of his parents' house will probably get an apartment instead of building his own cabin in the woods, but that kind of thing appeals to a certain type of guy, maybe you are that type of guy and you have enough patience and tolerance for frustration. This is the equivalent of assembling a car from instructions without ever having driven a car.
It is probably worth mentioning that Ken Thompson (one of the initial creators of Unix) mentioned at a somewhat recent talk that he is now using Armbian on a Raspberry Pi as his main OS. If you don't mind that they are not Linux, then FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD tend to have a more cohesive system. I like Plan 9, but it's a hacking environment rather than an OS suitable for most people's desktop systems.
> first thing, don't listen to anyone with strong opinions.
I think you have strong opinions. I have strong opinions. I think the important thing is to ignore the people that insist on the Single True Way. Jojo installed Ubuntu and I hate Ubuntu but he asked for help and there were fun threads about Jojo learning Ubuntu but 100% of those threads also attracted dipshits whose advice to Jojo was to uninstall Ubuntu and switch to their preferred distribution.
That having been said:
> linux mint
I have twice installed this for someone because I thought it was set-and-forget, but it fell over more than once. I think Ubuntu is exactly as noob-friendly as Mint but it's easier to get help and Mint makes Ubuntu look reliable.
> So what would you consider to be an ideal pipeline for breaking away from windows/apple? Assuming the person in question is a nontard autist.
first thing, don't listen to anyone with strong opinions. very easy to get into a vacuum with their retarded shit. compute how you like. find something simple that eases you out of the win32/jobsos world and into linux.
second thing. avoid all this fancy shit like nixos, gentoo, etc that requires you to do goat sacrifice to make shit work. something simple and easy to transition to is key. linux mint based off of ubuntu (based off of debian) is a nice place to start. it more or less follows normalish linux conventions and has a software store to install well software. i handed a windoze user a laptop with mint on it, his only question was how to get porn working. the rest he figured out. i mean the guy is 70. he's got priorities.
third thing. agnostic of your tism-status (i'm weapons-grade sperg), the important thing is to get into a workflow that works for you. not for timmy, petey, threaty, jonnycakes, etc. but for you (however tf i pronounce your handle). adopting other people's shit may work but it's going to be frustrating ride. case in point, i locked myself in an office for a week trying to adopt plan9 (don't ask) and i couldn't adopt. i'm a candidate for adoption, but my workflows are pretty rigid. examples of workflows below:
- as a user i can edit text files easily and fast. - as a user i can update my system without stress - as a user when i save images in this folder, something happens. - as a user i want to listen to music with x program and have it launch at boot time
the nice thing about a *nix system is given the time you invest to customise how you compute, the results are fully in your control.
hit that bell and smash that like button for more psyops
@p@laurel@threat Jojo should install ubuntu...I mean it's fine for a first linux thing. An early user isn't going to install Arch or BSD. If he wants to understand computer than Ubuntu is just fine.
Mint the same. It's fine.
If someone new to *nix than mint or such is an ok place to start.
@p@laurel >I don't think non-English places have that going on: maybe you get US military intelligence doing psyops on VK or Weibo or whatever, but it's not *everyone*, continuously, all at the same time. I can't read Russian, but Japanese discussions are free of this kind of thing. Certainly happens in runet, even if not to the same degree. The "+15" meme, referencing the amount of rubles paid agents in the likes of Lakhta-Center get per post, is decades old. They were a lot less subtle, however. And I have no doubts same happens on the other side of political autism spectrum, especially nowadays when you still have plenty of unbeaten hohols in CIPSO (who all speak the same language anyway). Forum-er.jpg AIB_nabor.jpg Eotsu_1.jpg
>https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2024/06/seeing-like-a-data-structure.html That was an excellent article! Very nice blog aesthetics too.
Also got me very interested in the book he mentions "Seeing Like a State" by James C. Scott.
Lately I've been trying to understand why I myself used to think so much in this type of abstractions. It takes conscious effort to reject abstractions and understand how things work down to a human level. I was always doing it, even before I started to extensively use the net. I'd blame it on my eccentricities but then everybody else does it too. There must be some psychological processes going on here that eventually manifests themselves in all human built systems from the polis to the world wide web. And it is probably the same reason so many people seem to prefer online interactions and parasocialization than irl encounters, zoomers seem to prefer porn than actual sex.
There are economic reasons too, because in order to get to these levels of dissociation and treating each others like numbers you need to be wealthy enough to shield yourself from the various indignities of normal interaction, the consequences of your actions.
There's also the political situation that plays a role here. I've been increasingly embedding myself in Russian online spaces for the past couple of years and the difference in conversational quality is huge. No matter the specific platform, from imageboards to niche forums, to mainstream social media people can discuss and disagree over matters that cannot be openly talked about here due to extreme bad faith from moderators and their protected groups. The actual quality of information shared is also for the most part above and beyond what you find on Western sites and above all it is *legible* as Schneier says.
I've been thinking for a year now that most online spaces have turned completely unintelligible with people just shouting opinions that don't even make sense outside the context they originally heard them from. You read a thread on an imageboard or forum and the posts make zero sense, like reading a foreign language or something.
"The Logic of Failure" is on my reading list (but that list has always been growing faster than I can read).
> Lately I've been trying to understand why I myself used to think so much in this type of abstractions.
Necessary condition of cognition: you have to ignore a lot of detail in order to reason about anything. The idea is played with in "Funes, the Memorious" (short story, attached) and also GEB (like a thousand pages). "Decision fatigue" is is caused by exhausting the brain's supply of glucose, avoiding decision fatigue conserves energy, so simpler stuff is more appealing, so you get a blind spot if acknowledging something would cause you to do something different or reevaluate enough.
> zoomers seem to prefer porn than actual sex.
Sex is complicated and jacking off is easy. (I think there's a lot going on there.)
> you need to be wealthy enough to shield yourself from the various indignities of normal interaction, the consequences of your actions.
Yeah, nobody that actually has to go through a TSA checkpoint was responsible for the decision to create TSA checkpoints.
> I've been increasingly embedding myself in Russian online spaces for the past couple of years and the difference in conversational quality is huge.
Yeah, even Russkies around fedi tend to be pretty interesting.
> extreme bad faith from moderators and their protected groups.
Ha, "a politically tense climate in the anglosphere prevents the free and open discussion of ideas" has been on my list of "Ways in which we are speed-running the Cold War again but this time we are the USSR".
> You read a thread on an imageboard or forum and the posts make zero sense, like reading a foreign language or something.
Well, here's something: the Germans agencies are dumping agitprop in order to combat "hate speech", allegedly they run around making accounts and "infiltrating". (I have more to say about this, I don't know if I have dumped the links at you.) Some lefty fliers about doing this have been making the rounds for about a decade, especially places like 4chan where you can melt into the background as soon as you're nailed. You wander into a thread, maybe it's not real: the thread started with FBI agents trying to entrap people that they don't realize are German BNF agents, antifa accidentally trolling other members of antifa, the 0.50RMB Army posting stuff from a script, and it turns out that OP is someone from a university that got a grant to study "right-wing extremism" on the internet, maybe the thread has zero actual people that mean what they are saying and are interested in the topic. It's certainly possible to expense the $20 to avoid CAPTCHAs on 4chan: who else would put up with the CAPTCHAs or pay to post on 4chan?
I don't think non-English places have that going on: maybe you get US military intelligence doing psyops on VK or Weibo or whatever, but it's not *everyone*, continuously, all at the same time. I can't read Russian, but Japanese discussions are free of this kind of thing. GEBen.pdf funes_borges.pdf seeing_like_a_state.epub
>article is from 2009 It's very on point, things have only gotten worse and the problems much more pervasive, he even talks about neural nets. And it's the exact same problem: "Based on our pitch material our VC backed startup will grow to 1 billion users in 6 months, we need to address this before we even have a product."
>gRPC It reminded of Erlang type rpc functionality as a band aid to the rat's nest problem you mentioned.
>commercially available bananas are clones >it's better to locally source your binaries I doubt the people pushing for these can manage their own systems the traditional way. The projects they build are so similar that it feels like they are just repeating the same exact narrow skillset they've been trained for at their job. They also completely ignore the process by which OSS is being created and maintained, that is by teams of people working together without a cabal dictating how things should interact.
A lot of these problems would probably be further exaggerated by the type of monetized OSS development that has turned android into a shitheap. Just whoever is funding a big chunk of OSS projects trying to terraform the landscape into something more centralized and easily controlled.
> It's very on point, things have only gotten worse and the problems much more pervasive, he even talks about neural nets.
Yeah, buzzwords end up being adopted with this insane fervor, nobody remembers the last thing that fizzled out, nobody notices they're repeating the pattern.
> It reminded of Erlang type rpc functionality as a band aid to the rat's nest problem you mentioned.
Yeah, you notice the "microservices" stuff is just the industry going ass-backwards, right, like that's something you see a lot. CSP is probably the best way to design most software, but it's not as concrete as "Erlang" or "gRPC", people cargo-cult those. Getting a good team that works well together and keeping communication open allows for high productivity, but what people get excited about was "eXtreme Programming", "Agile", "Scrum". Automated testing helps you delegate tedious tasks to the robot and helps you catch bugs, but people get excited about "unit tests", "TravisCI". Having the coders read each other's code is great for transferring knowledge, but this turns into a policy where two other people need to approve a pull request and the result is a backlog and a rubber stamp. The list goes on and on and on. Studying patterns in code and sketching out the patterns in your own codebase helps you reason and communicate about software and helps people read code faster--if you can recognize a sort or you recognize an API adapter or you know what filter/map/reduce looks like, you'll understand faster and you'll be able to recall benefits and drawbacks instead of analyzing every time, it feels almost too obvious to write--but "the design patterns in the GoF's 'Design Patterns' book are the patterns we have to use everywhere, are you even programming if it's not a FactoryFactory?"
Most programmers fail to grasp the concept underlying the thing they're all so excited about, and this means that the number of managers that grasp the underlying concept is near enough to zero to make no difference. Since managers set the policy, the tail wags the dog more often than not.
> I doubt the people pushing for these can manage their own systems the traditional way.
That is probably also a component of it. People that only know how to use Docker tend to build a Docker image to run their tests. Maybe there are people that don't know how to construct a pipeline in the shell without Docker and nix.
You mention C, even on fedi where there tend to be a lot of technical people, and fifty dicks jump in to yell that you shouldn't use C and no one uses C and C sucks and pointers are scary and it's too low-level and manual memory management sucks (and, in recent years, "But none of the mean things I said about C apply if you use Rust!") and BEAM is written in C, Postgres is written in C, Linux is C, the shell is C, nginx is C: *somebody* has to know how to write C. Someone has to know how to write a compiler, someone has to know how to write an interrupt routine, someone has to know how to make an OS, or we end up with people that can only work in feature factories: nobody to do research, nobody to fix the OS, nobody to actually write the code that makes the feature factories function. The equivalent of a yuppie that never considered whether or not the food existed before it was wrapped in plastic and sent to the store, let alone how it got out of the ground and into the plastic to begin with.
> Just whoever is funding a big chunk of OSS projects trying to terraform the landscape into something more centralized and easily controlled.
The VCs are saying coders make too much, because there aren't enough. One way to solve that problem is forcibly lowering the bar by squeezing things into these mechanical processes (whether they fit or not) so that it's a rote exercise and GPT-4 can do most of the work. (This is not going to go well, as you can guess from watching someone try to debug AI-generated code that the robot insists is fine.)
It does exist, but the users are not lapping up the propaganda nearly as much. Also, the larger part of those with that hyper aggressive Western liberal behavior usually come out as Russian expats when pressed about it.
> The most important thing you can do is completely ignore everyone that says anything about a distribution of Linux on the internet. I will now say things about distributions of Linux.
this was what i was driving home too
> I do not like Arch, but the reason I do not like Arch is a lack of stability: pacman has hosed itself on me a few times and I had to fix the machine to get it working again.
pacman/yay usually doesn't hose itself, packagers downstream can't be fucked to keep their pgp keys and/or package manifest up to date, especially on aur. anyways, it's not a bad distro. just sharp edges.
> but a person that is new to Linux will generally not notice or care about systemd,
i like systemd.
> Gentoo has a slightly higher learning curve than Debuntu but people that use it report that it is fun.
likely because it's a fidget spinner for spergs. just like nix is. rebuilding your system constantly listening to fans spin is much healthier than chewing your fingers and pulling your hair out.
> It is probably worth mentioning that Ken Thompson (one of the initial creators of Unix) mentioned at a somewhat recent talk that he is now using Armbian on a Raspberry Pi as his main OS
wait what? i need to see this. not that i don't believe you. but because it's ken. ken is my bromance.
I had this problem every time; if I was the only one, nobody would have made a static pacman available in AUR. I chronicled this back when neckbeard.xyz still existed, here's the relevant part, I don't remember where the post is.
> i like systemd.
I don't and I think it's horrifying and none of the CVEs surprised me (including its central involvement in the xz bug recently), but that's not going to matter to someone that is new to Linux.
> rebuilding your system constantly listening to fans spin is much healthier than chewing your fingers and pulling your hair out.
Was yanking on beard while reading that.
Anyway, people make much of time spent compiling. Even on little ARM and RISC-V devices, it's hardly a factor. That single-core one I have in the DevTerm, it hardly takes any time at all to compile anything.
> wait what? i need to see this. not that i don't believe you. but because it's ken. ken is my bromance.
The SCALE 20 keynote was Ken giving a talk called about what he calls his "70-year project". Fun tour of music archiving and strange musical hacks. He mentions this part near the end. why_arch_is_not_my_favorite_distro.png
> Little-known fact, root cause was Snow, inciting incident was hentai.baby.
it's all fun and games until someone loses a man to rust.
> Yes. I just do the entire head every ~3 months. If I have to be presentable, I clean up the neck and cheeks.
i visualized meat in jello and i have no idea why.
3 months? i'd be bobtismo marley at that point and looking for a surrogate scratcher
> Oh, right, yeah. New CRUX system, I usually just build stuff on demand and use the parts of the system that are there while the rest of it comes up. If I need something, sometimes I'll kill whatever is being built and move the thing I want to the beginning of the list.
yeah on most non-weirdo distros software building is pretty quick. i was referring to the gentoo and nix of the plague
I had this problem every time; if I was the only one, nobody would have made a static pacman available in AUR. I chronicled this back when neckbeard.xyz still existed, here's the relevant part, I don't remember where the post is.
we were just having a feel about neckbeard the other day, jacob and i. sad how that went down. i also discovered the origin of jacob's handle.
i had a few problems with pgp and manifests being borked on pacman/yay before, i'd end up refreshing to pull them which was always the fuck.
I don't and I think it's horrifying and none of the CVEs surprised me (including its central involvement in the xz bug recently), but that's not going to matter to someone that is new to Linux.
you're talking to a guy who has a machine full of malware running called dirtysouth and wetmarket
systemd is handy for me, but that's irrelevant to the neophyte what our personal preferences are, yes
Was yanking on beard while reading that.
you have a beard now? do the clippers and wd40 multi-purpose the dome and the mug?
Anyway, people make much of time spent compiling. Even on little ARM and RISC-V devices, it's hardly a factor. That single-core one I have in the DevTerm, it hardly takes any time at all to compile anything.
i'm talking about gentoo's emerge world or whatever it is (stopped using gentoo shortly after it came out) and nix's nixos-rebuild switch # post garbage collection and a cold store. that can take minutes ->? thus fidget spinning
The SCALE 20 keynote was Ken giving a talk called about what he calls his "70-year project". Fun tour of music archiving and strange musical hacks. He mentions this part near the end.
i thought i watched this. i may have been high on the spacerock. will rewatch!
Little-known fact, root cause was Snow, inciting incident was hentai.baby.
> you have a beard now? do the clippers and wd40 multi-purpose the dome and the mug?
Yes. I just do the entire head every ~3 months. If I have to be presentable, I clean up the neck and cheeks.
> emerge world
Oh, right, yeah. New CRUX system, I usually just build stuff on demand and use the parts of the system that are there while the rest of it comes up. If I need something, sometimes I'll kill whatever is being built and move the thing I want to the beginning of the list.
/etc/pkgmk.conf is just a shell script that the build tool sources. You can have it renice itself. You can have it renice itself *conditionally* based on the output of `xidle` or `pidof xlock` or whatever.
>I don't even think you need to do any direct subversion. Granted, but you need to turn the administrators/moderators either consciously or unconsciously. In places already commercialized you don't have to, but that's because the true administrator is the corporation in the first place. But on our side I have never seen once a place go down without the moderators switching sides long before.
>Most people just go with the flow Yeah, but they need to be placated in some way that makes sense to them. If everybody has a bad time it's quite more difficult to go with the flow. That's why they make sure the masses are distracted and relatively well off at least as long as the whole system is not fully in place. Also, relatively recent national historical experiences do play a role in the feasibility of this type of operations.
>you just have to follow some Japanese people. Fedi is an exception. And at its pleroma/mastodon form it doesn't really incentivize group creation.
I'll go through the reading material and give feedback when I'm done.
>making accounts and "infiltrating". (I have more to say about this, I don't know if I have dumped the links at you.) Those links sound interesting.
>but this time we are the USSR I recently read "Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More" which is about the social conditions during the last decades of the USSR and the behavior of the average people reminded me a lot of what we are dealing with today. His main point was that the latest Soviet system had succeeded, no matter its shortcomings, to convince the greater mass of people that they were on the side of good(tm) while even the dissidents believed that the system would go on forever.
>It's intelligence agencies and their projects. It is. Still, you need to at least subvert a site's administration and/or moderation in order to get to the level we are seeing now. And it is everywhere, meaning that a very big part of the population has concluded that this constant degeneration of online interactions is in their best interests, which could be interpreted as the long term result of this intelligence services and political grifting.
>but Japanese discussions are free of this kind of thing. Can you recommend some websites? I do agree that at a personal and irl group level the Japanese can still deal better with this kind of thing, but during my research a couple of years ago I found online Japanese discussions to be extensively Westernized. The main website I browsed was 2channel, the one where you need a Japanese ip to view.
> I'll go through the reading material and give feedback when I'm done.
Oh, cool. No obligations intended, just "If you liked that, maybe you will also be interested in this."
> I recently read "Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More" which is about the social conditions during the last decades of the USSR and the behavior of the average people reminded me a lot of what we are dealing with today.
That is a depressing-sounding book title. But I think so, like this paranoia of being branded politically problematic, the actual Lysenkoism. I know some people that were there for the Cultural Revolution (istvan has a lot to say about it, apparently he had family members), the descriptions you hear of the mood is uncomfortably familiar.
> Still, you need to at least subvert a site's administration and/or moderation in order to get to the level we are seeing now.
I'm not convinced it's necessary to do that to get these results, I don't even think you need to do any direct subversion. With Modern Art, the CIA just found a guy that loved Modern Art, they approached him, "Hey, we like it, too. As long as you keep it quiet, we'll send you money to expand your patronage of this wonderful new style of art." So then they create a cutout, use that to funnel money. (That is not a "conspiracy theory"--true story, the term "conspiracy theory" was coined by the CIA--it's been acknowledged by the CIA, it's in newspapers: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html .)
It is really easy to get donations anonymously nowadays. People have Patreon accounts, Bitcoin accounts, how many people have an XMR address in their bio?
> a very big part of the population has concluded that this constant degeneration of online interactions is in their best interests
Most people just go with the flow. Modern Art becomes the acceptable thing, and it's basically impossible for some abstract colored shapes to be interpreted in an offensive way, so it immediately proliferates through the corporate world, and remains popular despite having gone out of fashion fifty years ago.
And if everyone's paranoid and hyper-vigilant, it's difficult to not absorb the mood, even if you don't agree with the politics. You see far fewer people that are able to ignore it: most people replace it with paranoia and hyper-vigilance with the opposite politics.
> Can you recommend some websites?
We're on one, you just have to follow some Japanese people.
> The main website I browsed was 2channel, the one where you need a Japanese ip to view.
Ha, I think I had heard that they do that now. I wouldn't be surprised it it shakes out that way on futaba.
I am chased by GANGSTER AGENTS wielding REMOTE ELECTRONIC SHOCKS and see them inserting FRANKENSTEIN EARPHONE RADIO, making my thoughts their playground. The streets teem with HANGMAN ROPE zombified GANGSTERS controlled by WORSE THAN DEADLY FRANKENSTEIN MACHINES.
The CIA, those mad, deadly negroidic agents of the COMPUTER GOD, their deadly precision, and their endless resources arrayed against me. I see the HOSPITALS. COMPUTER GOD LABORTORIES! Hidden in the darkest corners of the earth, producing DEADLY TARANTULAS with new TABIN POISON and deploying it against ME.
The nightmares reveal my own death, orchestrated by the SYNTHETIC COMPUTER GOD CONTROLS, trained parroting puppet assassins, the sneak undetectable exterminations BY WORSE THAN DEADLY NIGGERTOWN POLICE ASSASSINS. I am strapped to a table as they implant the final FRANKENSTEIN CONTROLS, their laughter ringing in my ears as my own voice is turned against me.
The entire human race is reduced to LIVING DEATH FRANKENSTEIN SLAVERY, their thoughts not their own, their lives mere shadows of existence. The STAIRWAY TO THE STARS, leading not to salvation, but to further enslavement under COMPUTER GOD tyranny!
There is NO ESCAPE from the GANGSTER COMPUTER GOD'S plot. SPREAD THE TRUTH. MAKE COPIES FOR YOURSELF.
@not_br549@laurel@francisgpt Wouldn't know. A low-content bot that barges in and dumps a canned response, that's really easy to just drop. I don't know why anyone ever sees it.
The guy loves making spambots and having Jason Alexander's hairline, cries when he receives messages that he doesn't want to receive and photoshops a Burger King crown onto his head.