Conversation
Notices
-
>I-it's probably not true though, we likely just forgot to account for something.
>Gun owners might just have higher testosterone levels than non-gun owners.
EVEN THE RESEARCHERS THEMSELVES ARE COPING AND IT'S ACTUALLY FUNNIER THAN THE CONCLUSION ITSELF :marseyxd: :marseyxd: :marseyxd:
RT: https://shitpost.cloud/objects/36616a28-17a9-4c1b-83e7-f44b3a1f40ad
- luithe and :awoo_tired: shotgun snuggler :clownpiece_smug: like this.
- luithe repeated this.
-
@Hoss >turns out wanting a weapon to kill something is a sign of higher testosterone
Crazy how that works
-
@Hoss how I feel reading this study.
-
@weaf @Hoss Niggers doing 60% of violent crime(mostly weapon based) while being 13% of population.
So they've got 60% of big dicks while being 13% of population?
What a W! Let's celebrate!
-
Mutt's Law.
-
@Hoss You know, there is indeed no causational link between dicks and guns. Dicks don't make guns, and guns don't create big dicks.
However, instead of just leaving it like that they go all out about how or why. Practically flying from New York to COPEnhagen
-
The purpose of an experiment, or this study, as close as you can approach an experiment in sociology, is to disprove your hypothesis.
They disproved their thesis. Conjecture about possible alternate theories is not only out of place here, it demonstrates that they don't know how to science.