@gsuberland @foone board/bios revision for board are my bets.
Its funny because I literally troubleshoot issues like this on almost a daily basis for myself and others. :/
@gsuberland @foone board/bios revision for board are my bets.
Its funny because I literally troubleshoot issues like this on almost a daily basis for myself and others. :/
@foone Yeah, like I was saying, a lot of the boards up until 10th gen were very not memory focused, so they didnt have great shielding or trace layout, you often even got really bad t topology layouts or extremely long daisy chain that would fall over at anything above 2133 with 4 dimms.
Have you looked at the bios on the board, there may be a few updates that include "improved memory stability" and usually those are extremely helpful for running dimms made well after the board.
@foone the only reason I ask is because 8th gen Intel memory controller likes to fall over when dealing with 4 sticks of dual rank memory aside from micron e die, and z1/4xx boards (6th-9th) boards were notorious for shoving a ton of sa and io voltage when all dimms were populated or xmp was enabled, and by a ton. I mean voltage that will degrade or kill the imc fairly quickly, like 6 months to a year.
@foone default uncore/ring ratio I assume. What is vccsa and vccio read (voltages, system agent and IO)? also how much memory, dual rank sticks, or single rank? 2 dimm or 4 dimm, what mobo?
@foone intel or amd? what gen? this looks legit like a cache instability issue (not cache per se, but ringbus/infinity fabric instability)
Gl̀͏̵͜i̶̟͎͉̞̳̯̼̥̦̤͊̋̃ͮ͑ͯͪ͐̈͊t͇͔̙̣̟͔̻̤̝̓͒͑̈́͛ͩ̇ͣ̚ć͓̣̘̹̻̬͉̣̊̈́ͤ́̓ͦ̚h̛ doge, overclocker, hEDS/ADHD, they/them/he. :blackblob:
076萌SNS is a social network, courtesy of 076. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All 076萌SNS content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.