Notices by 🇺🇲 watson :dealwithit: (watson@freeatlantis.com), page 40

2) Smith is particularly stymied by highly complex regulatory statutes.)

Here, Smith is totally ignoring the Presidential Records Act — but it’s on the field and cannot be ignored. When multiple statutes apply, they often must be harmonized.

One of the key principles of statutory interpretation is that the specific controls over the general. And the Presidential Records Act is the more specific statute given what the facts are at issue as alleged in the indictment.

#TrumpIndictment

4) perhaps is in the Biden family’s tarot card reading — their fortune telling. But DOJ under Biden cannot simply wish away Trump’s defenses.

Sadly, the Leftist media in their breathless frenzy will not try to educate their viewers on how complex statutory construction works.

And truth be told, most of the relevant viewers wouldn’t get it even if CNN tried. Because they have something akin to immunity to deep rational analysis. To logic. To the law.

#TrumpIndictment

5) They are like paper people who can see in only two dimensions. /end

#TrumpIndictment

https://twitter.com/NEWSMAX/status/1595077525155508226

"I think there's a real judgement problem." Former Governor of Virginia Bob McDonnell sounds off on newly appointed special counsel Jack Smith.

MORE: https://youtu.be/ao7MK8rJGWE

#TrumpIndictment
1. Ancillary but telling... notice how the DOJ states 102 classified documents [pg 27]. Some were never marked classified, as noted in the indictment [count 11, page 30], but defined as classified after DOJ review.

Discovered after Trump affirmation of compliance in July 2022.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000188-a12f-db74-ab98-b3ff4de50000

3. This is background for my point.

Notice how there are only 31 documents [31 counts] outlined as national defense security issues.

This would mean approximately 70 classified documents are memory holed by this special counsel.

The Point: 70 defined “classified” documents retrieved, no description provided, those documents not a part of any legal contention – they just disappear. #TrumpIndictment

#TrumpIndictment
2. This is the originating predicate for the FBI raid. 

Again, according to page 27, a total of 102 documents were located and then immediately or later identified or defined as "classified" by the FBI/DOJ.

They were unable to use classification status as a legal mechanism to attack President Trump; instead, they use the non-production as an evidence enhancement to the ridiculous claim that Trump lied to them (sec 1001);
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1667379317750349825

#TrumpIndictment
4. I suspect we know what those sets of docs pertained to, and they have everything to do w/ DOJ-FBI conduct in Russiagate.

Originating Spygate operations (’15-’16), Russiagate (’16-’17), Mueller (’17-’19), Impeachment #1 (’19-’20), Durham (’19-’23) and Jack Smith ’22-present, are all part of one long continuum of weaponized DOJ and FBI operations.

Everyone protecting The Lightbringer.

/end

#TrumpIndictment
https://twitter.com/JoshuaSteinman/status/1667009151476846596

#TrumpIndictment
It is always about the Swampy lawyers…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/09/trump-todd-blanche-indictment-lawyer-john-rowley-jim-trusty/
https://twitter.com/DawsonSField/status/1667505297445777408

Interesting way to look at it...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-poll-most-see-security-risk-after-trump-indictment/

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1667971689513119746

#TrumpIndictment

2/2) "As a former federal prosecutor, I can tell you when you line up the cases against Secretary of State Clinton, President Donald Trump, and Senator Joe Biden. There is no reasonable prosecutor that won't tell you that the easiest case to make, a slam dunk case, is that Senator Joe Biden broke the law. There is no legal excuse, justification, or rational that ever justifies a U.S. Senator having posession of classified documents in his home or his office."
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1667954141111664640/pu/vid/480x270/K9UUhipD3w0FLB88.mp4

1/2) Former DNI John Ratcliffe says the FBI/DOJ is not applying the law evenly, as the clear-cut case of prosecuting Senator Joe Biden, who had no valid legal excuse or justification for possessing classified documents at his home, is being overlooked:

#TrumpIndictment

NOT "classified documents" !!!

Documents containing "classified markings"...

THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE!!

It's like the difference between votes and ballots.

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1667969642407555073

#TrumpIndictment

2/2) According to Paul, Smith purposely deleted a few words from the witness transcript that completely changed the story of the conversation in Paragraph a.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11100233/Trump-FBI-raid-padlock-Mar-Lago-records-truth-social.html

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1667362453838082049

https://twitter.com/doctormalibu/status/1667557450445385728

#TrumpIndictment

1/2) It’s Over,

No smoking gun.

Prosecutor Jack Smith had falsified evidence and committed perjury by signing off on Trump’s indictment.

On the Left is page 2/3 of the indictment where Jack Smith accuses Trump of “disclosing” a Top Secret Document to a podcaster in 2021. Note the specific quote.

On the right is the reporting of @ paulsperry, an unimpeachable source.

#TrumpIndictment

1/ "It was once unthinkable in America that the government’s awesome power of prosecution would be turned on a political opponent. That seal has now been broken. It didn’t need to be. However cavalier he was with classified files, Mr. Trump did not accept a bribe or betray secrets to Russia...

"The greatest irony of the age of Trump is that for all his violating of democratic norms, his frenzied opponents have done and are doing their own considerable damage to democracy."

wsj editorial board

2/ Other key points in the editorial:

"No one should be fooled: This is Attorney General Merrick Garland’s responsibility. Mr. Garland appointed Mr. Smith to provide political cover, but Mr. Garland, who reports to Mr. Biden, has the authority to overrule a special counsel’s recommendation. Americans will inevitably see this as a Garland-Biden indictment, and they are right to think so."

"It’s striking, and legally notable, that the indictment never mentions the Presidential Records Act (PRA)

4/ “My Corvette’s in a locked garage, OK? So it’s not like they’re sitting out on the street,” Mr. Biden said. AG Garland appointed another special counsel, Robert Hur, to investigate, but Justice isn’t going to indict Mr. Biden."

"As for willful, how about the basement email server that Hillary Clinton used as Secretary of State? FBI director James Comey said in 2016 that she and her colleagues “were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

3/ that allows a President access to documents, both classified and unclassified, once he leaves office... the PRA was written by Congress to recognize that such documents had previously been the property of former Presidents."

"In the court of public opinion, the first question will be about two standards of justice. Mr. Biden had old classified files stored in his Delaware garage next to his sports car. When that news came out, he didn’t sound too apologetic.