3/4) Corcoran's search of 80 boxes👇in 2.5 hours seems impossible & HE drafted a certification claiming THAT was a "diligent search" on behalf of NOT TRUMP - but the Custodian - aka Attorney 3 - who then signed it. This cert means "any and all" docs found IN THAT SEARCH were sent. https://twitter.com/LCDLAW1/status/1668584910557261824
4/4) "The Office of Donald J. Trump" listed on Subpoena refers to an official GSA office under the Former PresidentsAct-not to his personal office. Custodian of Records is an official position and Trump is NOT legally responsible for the Custodian signing Corcoran's nebulous cert. https://twitter.com/LCDLAW1/status/1668596724628111361
1/4) DONALD J TRUMP WAS NOT THE SUBJECT OF THE SUBPOENA:
It appears Trump was deceived by Corcoran (akaAttorney#1) into thinking he had authority👇to authorize acceptance of a Subpoena not addressed to him. Had it been addressed to Trump, he could've asserted his 5thAm right...
#TrumpIndictment McCarthy vs cnn: McCarthy vs cnn cnn asks McCarthy re Trump. McCarthy responded to this cnn reporter about them hiring mccabe and clapper after they leaked classified information and interfered in 2020
6/ "The special counsel could have finished his investigation with a report detailing the extent of Mr. Trump’s recklessness and explained what secrets it could have exposed. Instead the Justice Department has taken a perilous path. The charges are a destructive intervention into the 2024 election, and the potential trial will hang over the race."
7/ "And what about the precedent? If Republicans win next year’s election, and especially if Mr. Trump does, his supporters will demand that the Biden family be next. Even if Mr. Biden is re-elected, political memories are long."
5/ According to him, 113 emails included information that was classified when it was sent or received. Eight were Top Secret. About 2,000 others were later “upclassified” to Confidential. This was the statement Mr. Comey ended by declaring Mrs. Clinton free and clear, since “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”
3/ that allows a President access to documents, both classified and unclassified, once he leaves office... the PRA was written by Congress to recognize that such documents had previously been the property of former Presidents."
"In the court of public opinion, the first question will be about two standards of justice. Mr. Biden had old classified files stored in his Delaware garage next to his sports car. When that news came out, he didn’t sound too apologetic.
4/ “My Corvette’s in a locked garage, OK? So it’s not like they’re sitting out on the street,” Mr. Biden said. AG Garland appointed another special counsel, Robert Hur, to investigate, but Justice isn’t going to indict Mr. Biden."
"As for willful, how about the basement email server that Hillary Clinton used as Secretary of State? FBI director James Comey said in 2016 that she and her colleagues “were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”
"No one should be fooled: This is Attorney General Merrick Garland’s responsibility. Mr. Garland appointed Mr. Smith to provide political cover, but Mr. Garland, who reports to Mr. Biden, has the authority to overrule a special counsel’s recommendation. Americans will inevitably see this as a Garland-Biden indictment, and they are right to think so."
"It’s striking, and legally notable, that the indictment never mentions the Presidential Records Act (PRA)
1/ "It was once unthinkable in America that the government’s awesome power of prosecution would be turned on a political opponent. That seal has now been broken. It didn’t need to be. However cavalier he was with classified files, Mr. Trump did not accept a bribe or betray secrets to Russia...
"The greatest irony of the age of Trump is that for all his violating of democratic norms, his frenzied opponents have done and are doing their own considerable damage to democracy."
Prosecutor Jack Smith had falsified evidence and committed perjury by signing off on Trump’s indictment.
On the Left is page 2/3 of the indictment where Jack Smith accuses Trump of “disclosing” a Top Secret Document to a podcaster in 2021. Note the specific quote.
On the right is the reporting of @ paulsperry, an unimpeachable source.
2/2) According to Paul, Smith purposely deleted a few words from the witness transcript that completely changed the story of the conversation in Paragraph a.
1/2) Former DNI John Ratcliffe says the FBI/DOJ is not applying the law evenly, as the clear-cut case of prosecuting Senator Joe Biden, who had no valid legal excuse or justification for possessing classified documents at his home, is being overlooked:
2/2) "As a former federal prosecutor, I can tell you when you line up the cases against Secretary of State Clinton, President Donald Trump, and Senator Joe Biden. There is no reasonable prosecutor that won't tell you that the easiest case to make, a slam dunk case, is that Senator Joe Biden broke the law. There is no legal excuse, justification, or rational that ever justifies a U.S. Senator having posession of classified documents in his home or his office." https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1667954141111664640/pu/vid/480x270/K9UUhipD3w0FLB88.mp4