Notices by Faibbus :unverified: (faibbus@framapiaf.org)

@cancel
Dumb fishes that can't climb trees…

The example is just a few float multiplications, so yes, going over the top to create classes and introduce gratuitous complexity is just wasted performance.

I love how «adding a concern» is just adding another float computation…

I would enjoy watching the “array version” with other type of shapes (say random quadrilateral).

In my experience, “performance” first → terser code → errors/bugs.
A wrong but fast answer is a worse waste of resources.

@cancel My point was that this is a terrible example to apply OOP. Because there is no benefit to the added complexity. So I'm not sure why you assume I did not pay attention…

Judging “Clean code” on a few multiplications is somewhat like judging a fish on its ability to climb a tree. Expect bad result.

I also suggested the quadrilateral example because it would make slightly more sense to have polymorphism there as it won't be described by just a height and a width.