@pyrate No, it's just these are the core ideas behind Inferno: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(operating_system) It's supposed to be highly distributed, everything is running in a VM, so you could run it using any other OS as host. So it has a lot to do with JIT. And being developed right after Plan9, it could be considered Plan10. Most of the interesting ideas have been reimplemented/ported back into P9 though. @Zerglingman@p@MK2boogaloo@sysrq
@menherahair@dcc@kirby > x1050 Is this real "standardized" resolution or some joke you came up with? I mean why not make it at least "Full HD" just to avoid scaling? It's 30 pixels away from 1080 :marseylaughwith:
@kirby It's weird even in medium-width windows, it's only okay with a very narrow window — the only way you can have both the notifications and home timeline full-width.
@olmitch It's worse! Someone's trying to justify the use of systemd on Gemini! gemini://aelspire.info/posts/2023-09-18-systemd/post.gmi :marseyshock: The world is about to end!
"I have other things to do with life other than tinkering with my computer" — what sick kind of argumentation is that? :marseyraging:
@p Yeah, same here! Even in Firefox I have them disabled with image.webp.enabled=false, same for VP9 with media.mediasource.vp9.enabled and probably some other Google shit that I don't even remember of. And there've been only a few cases when I cared enough to actually download the file, convert it manually and see what's in it. Most of the time I just ignore them :marseysmug2: Problem is, I've been encountering these more and more often in the wild as of recent. I suspect, that one of the authors of some Fedi software like Firefish has decided that saving a few kilos is worth it and implemented an automatic conversion to WebP — I just can't imagine that a lot of people have decided to adopt it all of a sudden, especially with all those vulnerabilities discovered. I remember when they did it in Nitter and I had to patch this shit out myself for my instance. Why people decide to adopt it is beyond me — like I said earlier, the advantage is negligible in absolute most cases, even if it's only a few lines of code, the added complexity is not worth it. And I don't even see a lot of interest from developers TBH, there a just a few people, who run around submitting these patches and devs usually just go with it because: "Why not? Looks good on paper!" Anyway, I should probably start a media proxy or something, that would do the conversion for me. Or maybe I should just keep ignoring WebP images — haven't decided yet :marseylaughwith: @kirby@sysrq@lispi314
@lispi314 I think C has little to do with it, the biggest problem is that while it's being considered "an open standard" by many, it's not that — there is only one major implementation and it's Google's own implementation, others have little to no interest contributing to it as it will remain Google's implementation in any case. So having sole implementation that is used, in addition to obviously very popular Chrome itself, it's used by a lot of software. If that software has anything even remotely to do with images — why don't we add WebP support, right? So in addition to all the browsers, this shit is now everywhere. Why the fuck down ffmpeg in my system depends of libwebp? I don't know. Does anyone of you use WebP for any other purposes except for posting it on the Web? I don't and I doubt that anyone does — it's advantages over existing formats is negligible for personal use, but it still makes sense for Google as they serve petabytes of data and even 10% makes a huge difference. I might have digressed, but anyway — as it is used in software that is present virtually in every system and in addition to that, it's the same implementation, it makes libwebp a very attractive target for attacks. Monoculture is never good. These sole implementtion is closely studied by those, who intend to exploit it — this is where C factor might come into play. Another problem is that Google doesn't give a fuck about how and where their library is used. Because they only care about how it's being used in Chrome — Chrome offers some means of isolation, if one tab gets compromised, others are safe. And to me it looks like that is exactly what they think: "Oh, it's not that bad, it's isolated!" And that is true, and same is true for Android. But is it isolated in ImageMagic — no, it's not. And when this vulnerability has hit the news, that is exactly what one person came up with in comments on HackerNews: let's isolate/containerize it for ffmpeg and ImageMagic too. That's insane! Nowadays it's assumed that everything is isolated/containerized — but in reality it's not. And it shouldn't be! @kirby@p@sysrq
@newt@astheroth@xianc78 I have free librem.one account and I've never given them my address — which would make more sense if they wanted to just collect that data. Probably they are legally required for you to give them some billing address — for IRS and whatnots, I'm not sure how it works in the US :marseyshrug:
@thatguyoverthere I'm not a fan of chicken meat, I prefer beef or pork any day, but shouldn't it still be richer in protein? Or is it about nuggets not being exactly chicken? :marseyhmm:
@lina@dcc@ceo_of_monoeye_dating@iska@p@MK2boogaloo :marseyerasure: I don't see half of your posts from my instance as is and I have to look them up if I see someone replying to you. You're like a figment of imagination of my imaginary friends :marseyemojismilemouthtighteyes:
@dcc > bash script that will monitor How dare you! Go for Nagios or Zabbix straight away, and also setup up notifications so it sends you an email and even a short message to you cell phone when something happens. Remember not to use your carrier's API, use an old Siemens S45 phone with a spare SIM-cart to send out messages. You may of course also set up XMPP notifications if that's your kink — but that would be too easy IMO :marseyhacker: @p
@p@dcc But it's not something like load balancing, why even do this? Why not set up monitoring of main IP and when it goes down, do a dyndns update to the backup one? And yes, of course TTL should be low enough so it propagates quickly. Hosting your own nameserver just for this is an overkill IMO :marseyshrug: