Conversation
Notices
-
Interesting discussion imo
-
@branman65 @wgiwf @SuperSnekFriend @merchantHelios Its not healthy to dwell on such things anyway.
-
@KnifeEar @branman65 @SuperSnekFriend @merchantHelios I find that true for me as well. Pretty much when much whenever I hear someone try to speculate on it I find their description of Heaven to be offputing. It's probably better to accept that it is a mystery :itisamystery: then to try to comprehend the incomprehensible.
-
@SuperSnekFriend @merchantHelios It would be nice if people would just admit we really have no idea what's going to happen in heaven, especially given how little information is actually given about it. The obvious intent of that passage is the refutation of rabbinical law about marrying widows and confirming the resurrection to the doubting Sadducees.
-
@wgiwf @SuperSnekFriend @merchantHelios people in general don't like leaving things to mystery. it's like an itch that never gets scratched
-
@merchantHelios Owen Cyclops did another post prior to this one about how the post-Smith and post-Young Mormons have a step up above Christians regarding familial ethics due to the latter's (including Protestants sadly) insistence to the traditional interpretation of Matthew 22:23-33 and the Markan and Lukan equivalents, though he doesn't explicitly say this.
The more consistent Christians who hold fast to that interpretation do not care and do not fight Satan's army of adulterers, cucks, anti-natalists, race traitors, and fags as heavily as God demands throughout the rest of Scriptures.
Mormonism should not have this advantage, being inherently evil and heretical itself, but it will until family is re-oriented in Christendom properly away from the gross error we inherited from the "Church fathers" and Rome.
You can see this with some of the replies to Owen. (Notice Rovanstine also repeats the erroneous interpretation of 1 Corinthians 7.)