Conversation
Notices
-
He ain't wrong though :alexjonesheadscratch:
-
@s5s5s @Nils >Men did great things when it was harder to see boobs.
Your post was great until you parroted a tradcuck talking point encouraging depriving men and controlling male sexuality.
Men did great things *when it was much easier and more realistic for the vast majority of men to be secured a stable supply of pussy* is the correct answer.
-
@ChristiJunior @s5s5s @Nils
Women would breastfeed in public in Victorian times and it was considered a non-issue. Seeing boobs has generally not been that hard, the value is in being able to secure a good woman in exchange for being a good man.
-
@Nils It really is something how women assumed that male behavior would stay constantly Victorian era chivalrous while they completely changed their behavior to weaponized jewish feminism. Men did great things when it was harder to see boobs.
-
@s5s5s
On the contrary, boobs were everywhere. Feminism and happy merchants harnessed a historically abnormal puritan taboo and turned breasts into a commodity and a fetish.
@Nils
-
@ChristiJunior @Nils @s5s5s In general solid monogamous norms are good for properly channelling male sexual energies. Savage tribes very frequently have few or no restrictions around premarital sex and just use various herbs to induce abortions if things get inconvenient, and in such a society men feel little need to work beyond the barest minimum, and the society stays primitive.
-
@ArdainianRight
That’s the thing, until the advent of marketable visual pornography, context governed pretty much every body part. An ankle was not scandalous the way we think of it, but the inappropriate exposure of an ankle could be a signal inviting lewd behavior. If a woman tripped in the marketplace and her ankle were seen, the young bucks weren’t running home to abuse themselves over it. A breastfeeding woman was just unremarkable everyday life, so much that to record it in writing wouldn’t even occur to people.
@ChristiJunior @Nils @s5s5s