Conversation

@ChristiJunior @mao_yat based
Zelda hasnt become completely pozzed and I get the crossdressing was meant to be silly rather than deliberate tranny propaganda (hell the outfit wasnt even in TotK which was cool).

But its important to gatekeep the trannies and normies that only recently got into the series. Story-wise I think the new games are god-awful and it has everything to do with their insistence on “freedom”. I’ve found from arguing with BotK fans that they argue like libtards (“waaah the player should be able to choose for themselves!!!1!”) and it makes sense when you see that the new games have a design philosophy that closely resembles libtard individualism, especially in contrast to the previous philosophy which fans/devs say was “too restrictive”.

Content-wise they’re ok but I could see that changing with the next game. They totally eroded Link’s character in the last two games. He’s completely emotionless and boring. The more this trend continues the more justification they‘ll have to give Link a gender option because cleeeaarly he was always a self-insert character so why does it matter? OR they’ll make Zelda playable which I also don’t care for. Both would be dumb.

BotW practically doubled the Zelda fanbase and a lot of them are discord trannies. The demand for a feminised Link or playable Zelda is increasing and I don’t think Nintendo can keep them at bay long, not if they’re tweeting out black squares for george floyd.

luithe (luithe@varishangout.net)'s status on Thursday, 11-Apr-2024 03:25:43 JST

luithe

in reply to

@suquili @ChristiJunior @mao_yat >hell the outfit wasnt even in TotK which was cool
Yeah because they replaced it with more female esque attire

Public

Notices

Feeds