>In a constrained conversation, conforming implementations will implement FEP-400e with some very minor additions
In a constrained conversation we work with activities, not objects, is that correct? If so, should "context" collection contain activities or objects?
It seems to me that FEP-400e was written with objects in mind. I think it might be helpful if you clarify this moment in documentation.
>In a constrained conversation, the target->id and the context are identical. This provides easy identification.
In "Add to conversation" example the context is
https://streams.lndo.site/conversation/ed4775f8-18ee-46a5-821e-b2ed2dc546e8
and the target.id of the Add activity is
https://streams.lndo.site/item/ed4775f8-18ee-46a5-821e-b2ed2dc546e8
A similar inconsistency exists in "Conversation owner Adds the reply to the conversation Collection" example.