Conversation

Notices

1. 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 31-Mar-2024 17:51:16 JST 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

   • Dan_Hulson
   • Owl
   • Dicey
   Then it just shows how dumb you are.
   
   Prove that numbers exist. I think you just use them to cope with reality.
   • Senator_Armstrong (senator_armstrong@seal.cafe)'s status on Sunday, 31-Mar-2024 17:51:14 JST Senator_Armstrong

     in reply to

     • Dan_Hulson
     • Owl
     • Dicey
     @Humpleupagus @Dicey @Owl @Dan_Hulson I wasn't disputing your abstraction here, I'm asking what you want to accomplish with it
   • Senator_Armstrong (senator_armstrong@seal.cafe)'s status on Sunday, 31-Mar-2024 17:51:15 JST Senator_Armstrong

     in reply to

     • Dan_Hulson
     • Owl
     • Dicey
     @Humpleupagus @Dicey @Owl @Dan_Hulson why are you being facetious about these atheist arguments lol what is the goal here
   • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 31-Mar-2024 17:51:15 JST 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

     in reply to

     • Dan_Hulson
     • Owl
     • Senator_Armstrong
     • Dicey
     How am I being facetious? Prove numbers exist. If you can't, then gtfo.
   • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 31-Mar-2024 17:51:37 JST 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

     in reply to

     • Dan_Hulson
     • Owl
     • Senator_Armstrong
     • Dicey
     In order to address the question of whether God "exists," we first have to determine the ontological structure, and how we order the things within the world. I will assume that Dicey hasn't really thought this through. He should before attacking people with poor arguments. I'm not going to take any position in the ultimate question, but Dicey's position is shit tier, including his hypothetical which presumed his conclusion, and therefore, somehow proved him correct.
     
     Tl:Dr to get better arguments.