Conversation
Notices
-
@rootbsd @theorytoe @verita84
Was this before they made the nonfree iso the default? It’s a pain to add the non free stuff after. I’ve run Debian on a X220, which is very similar to T420 and nonfree iso was way to go.
I like LMDE for the updated version of cinnamon of course.
- Eric Shields | 🅜assTransitKrow likes this.
-
@dj @theorytoe @verita84 Debian changed their social contract a few months ago to allow nonfree to ship. I think the decision was a mistake.
I still have a nonfree-free ISO. Nonfree is only helpful to end users who need the firmware (for DVD/BD/Radeon etc). But I am running nonfree-free, headless Debian on 3/4 of my servers, and everything works as it should.
Last year, I had a talk with a fellow user about how their kernel update broke their ZFS and they felt I was blaming the license. I specifically said that the inclusion of nonfree firmware almost always results in undesirable behavior in an environment not meant to accomodate it.
-
@masstransitkrow @theorytoe @dj
Nom-free firmware is important to even install Debian for most people.
-
@verita84 @theorytoe @dj I've noticed. 😒