Conversation

Notices

1. Lichelord Godfrey (lichelordgodfrey@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 17-Mar-2024 19:10:20 JST Lichelord Godfrey

   in reply to

   • synapsid
   • Charles Synyard

   @CharlesSynyard @synapsid the one man, one woman limit is how you didn't have nearly as many "incels". we can be cynical about this if we want and just desire less "incels" by sticking to monogamy. it also makes inheritance easier.

   do you want more "incels"?

   am I taking bait? maybe. it's hard to tell.

   • Punished Misako likes this.
   • Charles Synyard (charlessynyard@bae.st)'s status on Sunday, 17-Mar-2024 19:10:21 JST Charles Synyard

     • synapsid
     @synapsid So so wrong. A husband can take as many wives as will wed him, and it is natural that the best men will have many women, and those who can’t attract a single mate who would rather be someone else’s 2nd 3rd, 4th, or 5th, should have none.
     It is time for the distortion of marriage, love, and sexuality that is monogamy, the one-wife limit, to end. There are many beautiful one-wife marriages, but despite, not because of the jealousy and even malice toward the husband, both by his wife and by envious men, that monogamy engenders.
     Frankly, permitting plural marriage, and encouraging it for those in leadership, should be Article 1 in any program for the good of the White race, or indeed for any people who would rather live than perish. #pluralmarriage #polygyny #polygamy #family
     
     RT: https://nicecrew.digital/objects/262b90ed-77d4-4f03-ad48-2da74c44aa55