Conversation

Notices

1. salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:38:42 JST Salyer

   #anarchy

   • LS likes this.
   • LS (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:39:44 JST LS

     in reply to
     @Salyer but without the government, who'd bomb the middle east?
   • LS (lain@lain.com)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:41:36 JST LS

     in reply to

     • zonk
     @nosleep @Salyer for free?
   • zonk (nosleep@bae.st)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:41:37 JST zonk

     in reply to

     • LS
     @Salyer @lain @Salyer me
   • Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:14 JST Moon

     in reply to

     • LS
     @lain @Salyer we'd have to have a bake sale
     LS likes this.
   • salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:57 JST Salyer

     in reply to

     • ≠

     @amerika

     Let me correct your last sentence for you:

     Abolishing leadership simply lets them take over, just like every form of government does.

     Just because you can not see a solution beyond government does not mean that there isn't one.

   • salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:57 JST Salyer

     in reply to

     • ≠

     @amerika

     LS likes this.
   • salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:58 JST Salyer

     in reply to

     • ≠

     @amerika

     Anything else with "leaders" will lead us into the same production of evil overlords.

   • ≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:58 JST ≠

     in reply to

     @Salyer

     Anarchy fails to lead, therefore always gives way to leadership systems or is conquered by them.

     History's pretty clear on that one.

   • salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:58 JST Salyer

     in reply to

     • ≠

     @amerika

     "History's pretty clear on that one."

     But we just need to get the "right" leader in this time? Or maybe we haven't tried "real" socialism yet?

     Anarchy isn't going to be easy, it requires a lot of personal responsibility.

   • ≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:58 JST ≠

     in reply to

     @Salyer

     I would prefer to avoid any form of socialism, but the voters chose that.

     Most people do not have personal responsibility.

     Abolishing leadership simply lets them take over, just like democracy does.

   • ≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:59 JST ≠

     in reply to

     @Salyer

     I like AnCap but we need hierarchy, which is why I am a royalist. No point screwing around with democracy, oligarchy, military rule, or dictatorship.

   • salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:59 JST Salyer

     in reply to

     • ≠

     @amerika

     Not sure where to go with your two replies.

     Long live our evil overlords! We need more of the same!

   • ≠ (amerika@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 02:42:59 JST ≠

     in reply to

     @Salyer

     Democracy produced our evil overlords. Maybe time to try something else?

     In terms of economics, I am thoroughly libertarian, but I think we also need a functional political system and social system (culture).

   • salyer@noagendasocial.com's status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 12:46:54 JST Salyer

     in reply to

     • Shrek

     @sarvo

     Yep, that's it, you found the truth that we have been hiding all these years.

     LS likes this.
   • Shrek (sarvo@novoa.nagoya)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2023 12:46:55 JST Shrek

     in reply to

     @Salyer@noagendasocial.com oh man, ancaps just want fucking hell on earth