Conversation

Notices

1. william.maggos (wjmaggos@liberal.city)'s status on Thursday, 29-Feb-2024 16:00:25 JST william.maggos

   • Aral Balkan
   • Ruud
   • LA Legault 🍉
   • jonburr
   • NoBeerToday

   @ruud @NoBeerToday @jonburr @aral @LALegault

   "No posts or links to content supporting, featuring, or promoting hate groups, terrorism, mass violence or calls to violence."

   Most obviously, doesn't discussion about even Sept 11 "feature" mass violence and terrorism? In a more disputed sense, I'd say supporting most US foreign policy is calling for violence. And if you say there's an exception for defense, that depends on how far back in a conflict we start the clock. was Hiroshima terrorism?

   • Ruud (ruud@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 29-Feb-2024 16:02:27 JST Ruud

     in reply to

     • Aral Balkan
     • LA Legault 🍉
     • jonburr
     • NoBeerToday

     @wjmaggos @NoBeerToday @jonburr @aral @LALegault Then I think we need to rewrite the rule. I would need to discuss with the team, but what we i.m.o. want to accomplish with the rule is prevent supporting or promoting terrorism etc. Not discussing it.

     Discussing 9-11 events is no problem, organizing/planning a new attack on our platform is.