I’m beginning to wonder if the email mental model some people suggest for #ActivityPub is a serious hindrance to understanding the concept of a federated, decentralized social graph.
Conversation
Notices
-
Steve Bate (steve@social.technoetic.com)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2024 22:38:36 JST Steve Bate -
infinite love ⴳ (trwnh@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2024 22:38:32 JST infinite love ⴳ @devnull @steve activitypub is email for websites, but what you're passing around is more than just a message. (by "activitypub" i mean the "post to inbox/outbox" bits)
-
Steve Bate (steve@social.technoetic.com)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2024 22:38:32 JST Steve Bate @trwnh @devnull So ActivityPub is basically just WebMail? ;-) Where does the social graph and applications (far) beyond twitter-like clones fit into this view?
-
Julian Lam (devnull@crag.social)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2024 22:38:35 JST Julian Lam @steve is email the "right" mental abstraction, or is it just the most convenient?
Even *during* the advent of email, "to", "cc", and "bcc" seemed oddly outdated, but that's because it too, came from something before it.
Nowadays with fine-grained permissions and ACLs baked into a lot of the software we already use, stuffing it into a recipient list seems awkward at best.
-
silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Sunday, 11-Feb-2024 22:39:01 JST silverpill @steve @trwnh @devnull ActivityPub is a decentralized data store where nodes synchronize state by exchanging "activities"
-