Conversation
Notices
-
@nishi redpill me on NetBSD
t. Didn't learn lesson from trying to get postgres + pleroma running on OBSD :marisa:
- New Janny in Town likes this.
-
@frogmaiden 1. mhm
2. i forgot but some one line
3. netbsd is faster, openbsd is kinda slow, bc of its too overkill security stuff
-
@frogmaiden
1. netbsd uses pkgsrc not ports
2. it is not that bad except you need to patch ecto a bit
-
@nishi
1. Reading the docs rn and mea culpa for conflating the FreeBSD term for packages with pkgsrc. Still, the important thing is from my reading it handles both binary and source packages without problem from what I can tell. Gonna continue reading to see what options you can set to compile (ala CXXFLAGS, USE flags) and how easily one can have everything compile with distcc.
2. Could you elaborate on what patches ecto needs?
3. Please tell me NetBSD doesn't do the OpenBSD thing of having its own, hyper-specific autistic way of doing things with sparse documentation
-
@nishi I know you run NetBSD for server use so I was wondering how your experience setting up Postgres + Pleroma + Nginx was on it, along with NetBSD server administration in general. It interests me due to the low resource usage and ports system (which I'm hoping will allow me to tune packages to my system like Gentoo without the nightmare of Gentoo + allow me to indulge my interest in distcc).
-
@frogmaiden wdym
-
@nishi found exactly what I wanted to see for distcc, NetBSD looking promising!
-
@nishi :ayayawooken: :ayayawooken: :ayayawooken: