Conversation

Notices

1. meso (meso@the.asbestos.cafe)'s status on Monday, 22-Jan-2024 23:31:17 JST meso

   • kumicota
   @Suiseiseki @kumicota this is also a matter of greed. They're so greedy that they won't put better camera sensors on their phones and instead will make the photos literally illegible using horribly written software
   • Heavens Feel likes this.
   • kumicota (kumicota@bae.st)'s status on Monday, 22-Jan-2024 23:31:50 JST kumicota

     in reply to

     • ​🇧​​🇷​​🇴​​🇳​​🇿​​🇪​​🇦​​🇬​​🇪​​🇭​​🇴​​🇬​​🇨​​🇷​​🇦​​🇳​​🇰​​🇪​​🇷​
     @BronzeAgeHogCranker @Suiseiseki @meso
     
     To add a bit into it, the main "problem" is the nyquist limit, cameras sensor has a limit on how small it can be and this is a physical limit, basically you get a bit of doppler effect on the surrounding pixels when you shot the photo.
     
     For example, the 48mpx sensor is over its limit and this is the reason why you get a bit of hazyness on the image when you zoom it, which is why some 12mpx cameras still beats in quality over other higher resolution cameras
     Heavens Feel likes this.
   • ​🇧​​🇷​​🇴​​🇳​​🇿​​🇪​​🇦​​🇬​​🇪​​🇭​​🇴​​🇬​​🇨​​🇷​​🇦​​🇳​​🇰​​🇪​​🇷​ (bronzeagehogcranker@geofront.rocks)'s status on Monday, 22-Jan-2024 23:31:51 JST ​🇧​​🇷​​🇴​​🇳​​🇿​​🇪​​🇦​​🇬​​🇪​​🇭​​🇴​​🇬​​🇨​​🇷​​🇦​​🇳​​🇰​​🇪​​🇷​

     in reply to

     • kumicota
     the situation is so much worse on samshit
     
     I think apple puts decent sensors in, the problem is that there's only so much you can do with a few square centimeters of equipment
     
     either turn on raw mode and accept that this kind of shot is going to look shitty, or throw down for a real camera
     
     (another complaint is with the absolute state of point-and-shoots and how a $300 piece of dedicated hardware performs about as well as an iphone)