Conversation

Notices

1. Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 00:27:41 JST Alex Gleason
   Baphomet statues absolutely are first amendment free speech. You are free to hate it but the whole point of free speech is to defend people and ideas you DON'T like. It is literally a slippery slope where Christians and Catholics will become censored if they don't allow devil worshipping. Sorry folks but it has to go both ways.
   • Token likes this.
   • Machismo repeated this.
   • Christmas Coon (mebigbrain@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 00:27:41 JST Christmas Coon

     in reply to
     @alex >"It has to go both ways"
     luithe likes this.
   • Nina Paley (nina@neenster.org)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 00:40:50 JST Nina Paley

     in reply to
     https://www.robkhenderson.com?utm_source=navbar&utm_medium=web&r=hwx4x
   • Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:03:36 JST Alex Gleason

     in reply to

     • Matty-kun :Christmas_kitty_bell:
     @matty I respect the viewpoint, and the whole reason I'm here is because I got cancelled and censored by libtards. But I'm holding out hope.
     Token likes this.
   • Matty-kun :Christmas_kitty_bell: (matty@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:03:37 JST Matty-kun :Christmas_kitty_bell:

     in reply to
     I defended everyone's right to free speech and then they used their free speech to take my free speech so fuck them and their free speech. The right virtue signal of affording your enemies who wish to overthrow you, the same rights you have is dead. There's no point in maintaining the niceties anymore.
   • salty_apollyon (rlier23@bae.st)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:06:43 JST salty_apollyon

     in reply to

     • ❄️:padoru: SantaSnekFriend :padoru:❄️
     @SuperSnekFriend @alex
     >you have to defend demon worshipers to defend your freedoms
     hey remember all those times we defended leftoids freedom of speech only to get backstabbed and banned by those same people?
     
     remember those times we gave the benefit of the doubt to faggots and other sexual pests only for them to use their power to censor us?
     
     come on how can people still fall for this bullshit?
     they came for me.png
   • ❄️:padoru: SantaSnekFriend :padoru:❄️ (supersnekfriend@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:06:44 JST ❄️:padoru: SantaSnekFriend :padoru:❄️

     in reply to
     @alex >It is literally a slippery slope where Christians and Catholics will become censored
     We have already been censored throughout the last century, including by the enemies of Christ using the same First Amendment that you are telling us to respect.
     
     I don't care about preserving the Constitution anymore. The Civil War and Roe. v. Wade should have both proven that the Constitution completely and utterly failed to do it's intended job and it has long become words used to preserve an anti-Christ and now also an anti-White liberal order.
     
     What matters for these next couple of decades is whoever is willing to wield to power regardless of what that legal document and precedence says, and the more faithful Christian Americans use power against their enemies, the better.
     Machismo repeated this.
   • Machismo (zerglingman@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:10:49 JST Machismo

     in reply to
     @alex How compelling
     Now face the wall
   • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:35:25 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠

     in reply to

     • ❄️:padoru: SantaSnekFriend :padoru:❄️
     @SuperSnekFriend @alex
     
     Civil Rights law meant enforced equality, which means Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Flying Spaghetti Monster, and Satanist displays in your capitols.
   • Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:39:58 JST Alex Gleason

     in reply to

     • @polarisera reposted your post
     @polarisera Christians (and people in general) should absolutely not have to bake a cake for anybody they don't want to. This is where we first went wrong.
     Machismo repeated this.
   • ≠ Brett Stevens ≠ (amerika@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:39:58 JST ≠ Brett Stevens ≠

     in reply to

     • @polarisera reposted your post
     @alex @polarisera
     
     Allow the groups to separate and the problem will sort itself. But you're going to have to get rid of civil rights law.
   • @polarisera reposted your post (polarisera@spinster.xyz)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 01:39:59 JST @polarisera reposted your post

     in reply to

     @alex Shitlibs didn’t do it for “free speech” . That’s the trouble with shitlibs, and the Supreme court noticed. Shitlibs believe Christian bakers must bake gay wedding cakes. Shitlibs also believe gay bakers don’t have to bake Christian cakes. There are no principles, only shitlibbing. Asymmetric primitive thinking should not be tolerated.

   • Peter (mcmlxviiotg@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 05:51:20 JST Peter

     in reply to

     • Matty-kun :Christmas_kitty_bell:
     The subversives couldn't even leave rather generic Christmas Trees alone, they needed to be inclusive. The kikes hung menorah ornaments on things they deemed *too Christian*. But (((Merrick Garfinkel))) would level hate crime charges against anyone dared to do something comparable to their statues and symbols.
     Machismo likes this.
   • CatSoc :nv: (catlord@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 18-Dec-2023 06:37:11 JST CatSoc :nv:

     in reply to
     @alex Alright my religion believes Hitler is the last reincarnation of holy Vishnu and I would like a statue in your state office. Go and advocate for that.
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.