Conversation

So you believe I'm "detrimental," to some movement of people who are terminally online and can't even agree on anything. If you people were smart and thought more long term about how to actually help your people you wouldn't be broadcasting your opinions online. You would infiltrate the system over a period of time. You can't challenge a system that has significantly more power than you do.

As for the Whitmer defendants - you don't even know anything about them. You know only what the conservative and leftist media reported respectively, and they both made big mistakes.

Those men wanted to take things offline and into the real world. Some of them simply wanted to learn defensive firearms training and medical training. They did nothing wrong. In your entire post here, I didn't see any mention of your philosophy or approach to fixing a broken system.

Calling people a detriment who are trying to help is retarded. If my documentary reaches someone inside the FBI who knows they are in a fucked up system and that person chooses to come forward I welcome that. We have already had whistleblowers provide documents that are important for everyone to see how the FBI breaks the law.

Call it "detrimental optimism," I'm still doing more than most people here.

Most people sit and complain or write out long winded big brain takes but at the end of the day they aren't taking on the risk I am or doing half the work or investing half the money.

How about the families of the men you referred to as "fodder"? How about their children? These are the people I'm helping. Not sure about others here and who specifically they are helping.

Public

Notices

Feeds