The EU has reached agreement on the Cyber Resilience Act. The situation for open source has changed remarkably compared to earlier versions, it appears in a good way. Before issuing fresh hot takes, please take the time to understand what the (not yet published text) actually says. Even people well versed are still processing things! https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_6168
@aral@bert_hubert Thanks Aral ! I believe these definition here will be key:
(10)In order not to hamper innovation or research, free and open-source software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity should not be covered by this Regulation. This is in particular the case for software, including its source code and modified versions, that is openly shared and freely accessible, usable, modifiable and redistributable. In the context of software, a commercial activity might be characterized not only by charging a price for a product, but also by charging a price for technical support services, by providing a software platform through which the manufacturer monetises other services, or by the use of personal data for reasons other than exclusively for improving the security, compatibility or interoperability of the software.
and
(23)‘making available on the market’ means any supply of a product with digital elements for distribution or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge;
@bert_hubert@0xtdec Misleading post? Calm down, tiger. It’s a reply with a link to the only publicly-available version at the moment and this thread provides the context. When the latest version is live, we can post a link to that also. No need to go throwing about accusations when we’re having a conversation here.
@aral@0xtdec they worked on it until midnight, I assume they need some time to formalise the results of their negotiations. I don't know when the new stuff becomes public. Meanwhile your misleading post that refers to the September version as the current version is still up, which is not helpful for anyone.
@aral@0xtdec no you are needlessly leaving up information you know is false. There is enough misinformation already in this world without adding more of it. But apparently that is fine with you.
@bert_hubert@0xtdec Bloody hell, dude, what the fuck is your problem? Which part of “it’s the only publicly available text I could find” do you not get? Actually, forget it. Why am I wasting time with this bullshit?