Conversation
Notices
-
@rlier23 Female characters actually being attractive is ultimately the single most important thing. Even if you only got modestly dressed girls in your games, that's okay as long as they're still so good-looking that you'd WANT to lewd them (and the internet can usually deliver the goods there). When female characters are purposely made so ugly that you DON'T even want to imagine them naked or in lewd situations (insert TLOU2 Abby getting plowed meme here), that's when we have a crisis on our hands. There are semi-understandable reasons for games holding back the fanservice (like aiming for a particular age rating), but there's no excuse for making all the most important female characters unattractive.
- Ardainian Hebrew Israelite and Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks like this.
-
hmm i feel like i've probably said this before at some point...
anyways, i think there's a massive difference between(most) people like us here in regards to fanservice and female beauty as in we are a lot more tolerant when it comes to levels of lewd or non lewd
we can admire more cute/modest designs like the first image while also apreciating the more risque outfits like the seccond image, meaning we don't care about censorship or removal of tame outfits, we just accept them all in all their shapes and sizes as long as they are not outright ugly
this however does not apply to those that may find fanservice to be unpalatable or ""not of their taste"", these peoples will infact not only criticize fanservice but will also try to take it down and censor it no matter what it takes.
that's why i think it's wise to distrust anyone that may show the slightest hostility towards fanservice :ina_nod:
image.png
image.png