Conversation

Notices

1. Shadowman311 (shadowman311@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 12-Nov-2023 16:31:51 JST Shadowman311
   The NHS is killing another White infant with health issues, once again a hospital in Italy has offered to care for the infant, once again the NHS has ordered that infant die instead. The only difference here as far as I can tell is that the Vatican hasn't offered direct support, since at this point, they know better than to expect basic human decency from the British healthcare system.
   
   May God damn the NHS.
   • Machismo likes this.
   • 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘 (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 12-Nov-2023 22:03:53 JST 🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

     in reply to

     • Dan_Hulson
     Family law is fucked. While I can't advocate for it, I'm not surprised when a family law judge gets whacked.
     Machismo likes this.
   • Dan_Hulson (dan_hulson@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 12-Nov-2023 22:03:54 JST Dan_Hulson

     in reply to
     @Shadowman311 This is just peak Britain the courts kept me from my own Children for being racist and refusing to renounce my beliefs
   • Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks (washedoutgundampilot@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 03:44:05 JST Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks

     in reply to

     @Shadowman311 They see this as a skull they MUST collect for the UK gov trophy case, killing the white infant will preempt years of negroid whinging about how “they let that lil cracker baby live, they’d NEVER do that for a BIPOC child!!!!!”

   • Shadowman311 (shadowman311@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 11:03:49 JST Shadowman311

     in reply to

     • Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov ⭐⭐⭐ 🇦🇷
     • SapientPearwood
     @SapientPearwood @Ivan_Ivanovich >Again, the only way it makes ANY sense is if you look at it from the perspective of they want completel control over their citizenrys life and death.
     
     As stated by one of the posters in the attached images, the point is not to say that they control their citizenry's life and death, the point is to say that the (White) children of the citizenry are wholely and completely owned by the government and that any deviation from that is impossible.
     Woggy's Zeonic Frolicks likes this.
   • Shadowman311 (shadowman311@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 11:03:50 JST Shadowman311

     in reply to

     • Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov ⭐⭐⭐ 🇦🇷
     @Ivan_Ivanovich The last time was even more insane (Alfie Evans), Pope Francis himself publicly stated that the Vatican would pay for the child's entire treatment at the single best hospital in the entirety of Italy, regardless of how expensive it became, and he personally flew out doctors from that hospital on a Vatican plane to London to take the child from the NHS, in response the London Metro PD blocked the entrance to the hospital, forbade the Italian doctor's entry and waited until Alfie died.
   • SapientPearwood (sapientpearwood@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 11:03:50 JST SapientPearwood

     in reply to

     • Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov ⭐⭐⭐ 🇦🇷
     I understand a little more with them stopping care for Alfie, from what I've seen of that case he was absolutely brain dead despite the videos his mother posted "proving" that he was still there.
     
     That being said there was absolutely NO reason for the government to block him being transported to another country to medical treatment, even though he is braindead, and it makes absolutely NO sense from a "they want to do what's best" perspective. The only way I can make it make sense is they want complete power over their citizens lives, otherwise why was the child not allowed to be transported when the pope had already said the Vatican would cover all the expenses?
     
     This situation seems different from the little I know about it. I haven't seen any reports that this child is braindead. All I can find is that the child is "terminally ill" and suffers from a mitochondrial disease that "might take her life". That leaves a chance that she will be able to make it, she's already beaten the odds several times, and there should be absolutely no issue with transferring her for treatment to one of the absolute BEST hospitals in Europe if not the world. If the elite British aristocrats can just up and go to wherever they want for treatment it makes no sense to me why this child cannot also be moved and given a chance at life instead of a definite death sentence.
     
     When you read the judge's ruling it doesn't come across as a rational explanation of why the child shouldn't be transferred and given treatment abroad. Instead he is bitching about Italy overstepping its authority and said "Italian government and the Vatican were "wholly misconceived" attempting to transfer the ill infant into their custody." Which to me makes it seem like they're angry that Italy and the Vatican even tried to step in and help with the child. Again, the only way it makes ANY sense is if you look at it from the perspective of they want completel control over their citizenrys life and death.
   • Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov ⭐⭐⭐ 🇦🇷 (ivan_ivanovich@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 11:03:51 JST Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov ⭐⭐⭐ 🇦🇷

     in reply to
     @Shadowman311 I've been seeing this, it's mind boggling.