Conversation
Notices
-
Thank you for telling me your religion is made up and you dont trust the word of God. That you think He is a liar and His word means nothing.
-
Youre so tiresome. It literally says the children of the flesh are not Gods, but obly the children of the promise. Paul was Israel only.
Moreover, your pwn church founder commented that the gospel had already been given to the whole world in his time. Youre a hypocrite.
>Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
>5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
>6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
>7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
>8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
-
You guys love to deny the words of jesus. Abraham had 8 sons. Ishmael had 12 of his own. Paul explains in Romans 9 that the children of the promise only come through Isaac, Abraham’s true heir.
Learn2bible 🙄
-
@Xenophon @BowsacNoodle @norsebaptist Exact Scripture reference. Nobody is interested in your delaying tactics. Do you keep kosher? If not, why not?
-
@Xenophon @BowsacNoodle @norsebaptist Jesus identifies the devil, Satan, as the same being called "ha Satan" in Genesis. Lrn 2 Bible.
>calls certain Judeans the offspring of Satan.
The same scripture where Jesus acknowledges the Jews are the descendants of Abraham and was using the accusations of being "offspring of the devil" as obvious hyperbole?
Do you keep kosher?
-
@Xenophon @norsebaptist @BowsacNoodle You believe brown people are the offspring of Satan, and the offspring of demons are to be exterminated, just as the nephilim were. Why aren't you doing "God's work"?
-
I do not believe brown people are the offspring of satan. This is a ridiculous claim. Satan means "the adversary", which im sure you know. Both God in Gen 3, amd Jesus 3 times in matthew, a few times in Mark and Luke, as well as notably in John 8, call certain Judeans the offspring of Satan. Paul also repeats in. But those people are not brown, and nowhere am I commanded to kill them. In fact quite the opposite.
>29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
>30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
It isnt my job to gather the tares. It is Yahwehs glory.
-
>Lord‘s work of exterminating brown people.
Well thats not actually in the bible.
-
@Xenophon @Godcast @BowsacNoodle 10/10 on the schizo post, 1/10 on the execution. When am I going to start seeing CI martyrs going to jail or being executed for doing the Lord‘s work of exterminating brown people. Time to nut up or shut up faggot.
At least I have sons and a warm pair of tits waiting for me at home.
-
@Xenophon @Godcast @BowsacNoodle @norsebaptist We wuz ghost peepo, ain't got no flesh nibba I'm made of PROMISE Y'ALL
-
@Xenophon @BowsacNoodle @norsebaptist >No
So dietary restrictions were never ever commanded by God on your reckoning?
>Paul makes it clear why the death of God, as Jesus, was necessary.
For the propitiation of sin.
>His death was necessary to fulfill the law, and througj His death He ended the requirement for the law.
So God removed the requirements of the law. But in your first sentence, you flatly denied God changes the law. Removing it entirely is a pretty big change. Which is it? Does He change the law or doesn't he?
-
@Xenophon @BowsacNoodle @norsebaptist >Circumcision does not benefit any man in Christ Jesus.
So God *can* abrogate His commands if He so chooses?
-
No. Paul makes it clear why the death of God, as Jesus, was necessary. You ignore the time component, and it makes you look ignorant. An Israelite divorced from God could not know Him before Jesus, in Pauls own words. His death was necessary to fulfill the law, and througj His death He ended the requirement for the law.
-
I gave you the scripture.
>6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter
I cant seem to find the word kosher in the bible. Not sure why id keep edomite traditions.
-
@Xenophon @BowsacNoodle @norsebaptist Whoa, you don't keep biblical dietary restrictions? But the Bible says you have to keep dietary restrictions and as you said, "God doesn't change His commands." So why don't you keep kosher?
-
I just cited you why. Circumcision does not benefit any man in Christ Jesus. If you keep the law, you are beholden to it. My salvation is througj faith (the faith of Abraham) not through works.
Thanks for playing.
-
I already quoted Paul to you.
6 and now we have ceased from the law, that being dead in which we were held, so that we may serve in newness of spirit, and not in oldness of letter.
The law still exists, but it doesn't benefit any man to follow it. If you want to hold to the law, and rely on that for your salvation, by all means go ahead. But no human can follow the law. So do I sin against the law? Yes. Am I worried about it? No. Because my salvation is through the faith that was promised to Abraham, not through works.
Xenophon :demon_wojak:
Godcast (hates Christmas music half)
NorseBaptist
SuperLutheran (Festive half)
All ０７６萌ＳＮＳ content and data are available under the